INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN THE OWNER'S APPLICATION FOR RESTITUTION OF PROPERTY AND THE RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR HOME

Autorice u radu analiziraju na koji se način konvencijska zaštita vezana uz čl. 8. Konvencije i pravo na poštovanje doma odražava na vindikacijski zahtjev uređen pravilima hrvatskoga prava. Prikazuju značajne razlike s obzirom na predmet zahtjeva, gdje se pojmom doma u pravcu pružanja zaštite prava na poštovanje doma u konvencijskom pravu daje znatno šire značenje nego što je to slučaj s pojmom nekretnine (stvari) kao predmeta zahtjeva u hrvatskom pravu. Istražuju određenu mjeru usporedivosti u odnosu na dilatorne prigovore, a u vezi s tim, tzv. testiranje određenog pitanja (prigovora) u smislu spada li u djelokrug čl. 8. st. 1. Konvencije, te je li uplitanje države u skladu sa zahtjevima iz čl. 8. st. 2. Konvencije, gdje se osnovanost prigovora temelji na zaštiti prava na poštovanje doma u odnosu na koje je došlo do miješanja, odnosno ograničenja propuštanjem, a miješanje ili propuštanje nije bilo u skladu sa zakonom, odnosno jednim od taksativno navedenih legitimnih ciljeva, razmjerno, te nužno u demokratskom društvu.In this paper, the authors discuss the methods by which the right to respect for home as guaranteed under Article 8 of the Convention has repercussions on the vindication complaint as regulated under the Croatian law. Significant differences concerning the object of the complaint are analysed and discussed, since under the Convention the concept of home has much broader meaning than the concept of property under the Croatian law. The authors analyse whether and up to what level the right to respect for home can be compared with the Croatian concept of dilatory exceptions. In relation to this question, the authors show how the determination of a complaint by an individual under Article 8 of the Convention necessarily involves a two-stage test. The first stage concerns the applicability of Article 8; in other words, is the right which an individual complains has been interfered with, a right to respect for home. If Article 8 is found to be applicable, the Court will question has there been interference with the applicant's right to respect for home. Finally, for this paper, the most relevant is stage two of the test where the Court questions was the interference in accordance with the law; does it pursue a legitimate aim and most importantly, was it necessary in a democratic society and proportionate