The law speaks of a corporation as a \u27legal person\u27-- as a subject of rights and duties capable of owning real property, entering into contracts, and suing and being sued in its own name separate and distinct from its shareholders. For many centuries there have been a heated controversy between corporate nominalists and corporate realists as to the \u27essence\u27of this soulless and bodiless person. The first purpose of this paper is to end this age-old \u27corporate personality controversy\u27once and for all. It is, however, not by declaring victory for one side or the other, but by declaring victory for both. The key to this claim is the observation that an incorporated firm is composed of not one but two ownership relations: the ...