We compare adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopoly game in which a home and foreign firm compete in R&D and output and, because of spillovers, each firm benefits from the other's R&D. When the government can commit to an export subsidy, such a policy raises welfare relative to cooperation, except when R&D is highly effective and spillovers are near-complete. Without commitment, however, subsidisation may yield welfare levels much lower than cooperation and lower even than free trade, though qualifications to the dangers from no commitment are noted
We set up a simple trade model with two countries hosting one firm each. The firms invest in cost-re...
The authors consider the free-market and socially optimal outcomes in a general oligopoly model with...
This paper highlights the importance of product differentiation and endogenous R&D in determining th...
We compare adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopoly game i...
This paper compares adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopol...
This paper compares adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopol...
This paper compares adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopol...
We compare adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopoly game in...
This paper compares adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopol...
We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a h...
We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a h...
We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a h...
We have investigated non-cooperative and jointly optimal R&D policies in the framework of Spencer & ...
Trade policy has been a popular field of economists ’ interests since Brander and Spencer works were...
This paper examines the free-market and socially optimal outcomes in a dynamic oligopoly model with ...
We set up a simple trade model with two countries hosting one firm each. The firms invest in cost-re...
The authors consider the free-market and socially optimal outcomes in a general oligopoly model with...
This paper highlights the importance of product differentiation and endogenous R&D in determining th...
We compare adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopoly game i...
This paper compares adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopol...
This paper compares adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopol...
This paper compares adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopol...
We compare adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopoly game in...
This paper compares adversarial with cooperative industrial and trade policies in a dynamic oligopol...
We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a h...
We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a h...
We examine optimal industrial and trade policies in a series of dynamic oligopoly games in which a h...
We have investigated non-cooperative and jointly optimal R&D policies in the framework of Spencer & ...
Trade policy has been a popular field of economists ’ interests since Brander and Spencer works were...
This paper examines the free-market and socially optimal outcomes in a dynamic oligopoly model with ...
We set up a simple trade model with two countries hosting one firm each. The firms invest in cost-re...
The authors consider the free-market and socially optimal outcomes in a general oligopoly model with...
This paper highlights the importance of product differentiation and endogenous R&D in determining th...