There is general acceptance that those who break the law must be punished; however, not all agree as to why this is necessary. Some argue punishment is necessary to reform criminals, others to deter criminals, and others because you deserve it, whether punishment reforms or deters. Stripped of metaphors, this paper argues that punishment is retribution, but that a distinction must be made between the definition of punishment as retribution and its justification, if a case is to be made for its moral justification. Thus the most important question the paper raises relates to the justification of punishment as retribution
The article, based on the McWilliams Memorial lecture in June 2018, has a short response from Prof N...
I argue that there is no general justification, meaning a justification that holds across a broad ra...
This article argues that the justification of punishment is best conceived as a problem of political...
There is general acceptance that those who break the law must be punished; however, not all agree as...
Two main types of principle, retributive and consequentialist, have long been identified as the main...
The widespread practice of state punishment is somewhat puzzling from a moral point of view. Why sh...
This paper tackles the question whether we should punish a remorseful offender. Traditional retribut...
The never-ending debate about the substantive and procedural rules in our criminal justice system ra...
This thesis is an enquiry into why we punish. Though acknowledging that official legitimisation of p...
Punishing criminals involves more than visiting unwelcome experiences–the rack, the gallows, confine...
Although punishment has been a crucial feature of every legal system, widespread disagreement exists...
What actions should be punished? Should plea-bargaining be allowed? How should sentencing be determi...
In philosophical writings, the practice of punishment standardly features as a terrain over which co...
ABSTRACT: One of the three fundamental institutions of the criminal law is the sanction. It represen...
In this paper, I consider the question of whether crime victims can be said to have a moral right to...
The article, based on the McWilliams Memorial lecture in June 2018, has a short response from Prof N...
I argue that there is no general justification, meaning a justification that holds across a broad ra...
This article argues that the justification of punishment is best conceived as a problem of political...
There is general acceptance that those who break the law must be punished; however, not all agree as...
Two main types of principle, retributive and consequentialist, have long been identified as the main...
The widespread practice of state punishment is somewhat puzzling from a moral point of view. Why sh...
This paper tackles the question whether we should punish a remorseful offender. Traditional retribut...
The never-ending debate about the substantive and procedural rules in our criminal justice system ra...
This thesis is an enquiry into why we punish. Though acknowledging that official legitimisation of p...
Punishing criminals involves more than visiting unwelcome experiences–the rack, the gallows, confine...
Although punishment has been a crucial feature of every legal system, widespread disagreement exists...
What actions should be punished? Should plea-bargaining be allowed? How should sentencing be determi...
In philosophical writings, the practice of punishment standardly features as a terrain over which co...
ABSTRACT: One of the three fundamental institutions of the criminal law is the sanction. It represen...
In this paper, I consider the question of whether crime victims can be said to have a moral right to...
The article, based on the McWilliams Memorial lecture in June 2018, has a short response from Prof N...
I argue that there is no general justification, meaning a justification that holds across a broad ra...
This article argues that the justification of punishment is best conceived as a problem of political...