This paper presents the views of judicial decision-makers (n= 1794) in four child protection jurisdictions (England, Finland, Norway, and the USA (California)), about whether parents and children are provided with appropriate opportunities to participate in proceedings in their countries. Overall, the study found a high degree of agreement within and between the countries as regards the important conditions for parents and children´s involvement, although the four systems themselves are very different. There was less agreement about children’s involvement than parents’, and the court decision-makers from Norway and Finland were more likely to express doubts about this. Nevertheless, the main message from the judicial decision-makers is that...
This paper compares how frontline staff in four national child welfare systems and policy contexts –...
This article examines discretionary reasoning in child’s best interest (CBI) assessments in two juri...
This paper draws on an international comparative study of social work decision-making in cases that ...
This paper presents the views of judicial decision-makers (n = 1794) in four child protection jurisd...
This international comparative paper examines how child protection workers in four countries, Englan...
This article examines parents' involvement in care order decision-making in four countries at one pa...
Child friendly justice and access to justice for children are explicit concerns for the European Uni...
This paper examines whether and how the views of professional decision makers in public agencies and...
Care orders within the child protection system are some of the most invasive interventions a state c...
Child friendly justice and access to justice for children are explicit concerns for the European Uni...
This international comparative paper examines how child protection workers in four countries, Englan...
This paper examines the discretionary reasoning of the judiciary in three jurisdictions, England, Ge...
Care orders within the child protection system are some of the most invasive interventions a state c...
Children’s participation in all matters that concern them, particularly child protectiondecision-mak...
In this article, we consider different perspectives on who is best able to provide relevant and help...
This paper compares how frontline staff in four national child welfare systems and policy contexts –...
This article examines discretionary reasoning in child’s best interest (CBI) assessments in two juri...
This paper draws on an international comparative study of social work decision-making in cases that ...
This paper presents the views of judicial decision-makers (n = 1794) in four child protection jurisd...
This international comparative paper examines how child protection workers in four countries, Englan...
This article examines parents' involvement in care order decision-making in four countries at one pa...
Child friendly justice and access to justice for children are explicit concerns for the European Uni...
This paper examines whether and how the views of professional decision makers in public agencies and...
Care orders within the child protection system are some of the most invasive interventions a state c...
Child friendly justice and access to justice for children are explicit concerns for the European Uni...
This international comparative paper examines how child protection workers in four countries, Englan...
This paper examines the discretionary reasoning of the judiciary in three jurisdictions, England, Ge...
Care orders within the child protection system are some of the most invasive interventions a state c...
Children’s participation in all matters that concern them, particularly child protectiondecision-mak...
In this article, we consider different perspectives on who is best able to provide relevant and help...
This paper compares how frontline staff in four national child welfare systems and policy contexts –...
This article examines discretionary reasoning in child’s best interest (CBI) assessments in two juri...
This paper draws on an international comparative study of social work decision-making in cases that ...