We report an experiment that asks whether people in a strategic situation behave according to the Golden Rule, that is, do not treat others in ways that they find disagreeable to themselves, a property that we call role‐reversal consistency. Overall, we find that over three quarters of the subjects are role‐reversal consistent. Regression analysis suggests that this finding is not driven by players maximizing their subjective expected monetary earnings given their stated beliefs about their opponents' behavior. We find that subjects' stated beliefs and actions reveal mild projection bias. (JEL C78, C91
Using data on one-shot games, we investigate the assumption that players respond to underlying expec...
This paper puts three of the most prominent specifications of ‘other-regarding’ preferences to the e...
People consider fairness as well as their own interest when making decisions in economic games. The ...
The financial support from the Super Pump Priming Fund (currently named as RIS Fund) at the Universi...
We report an experiment that asks whether people in a strategic situation behave according to the Go...
We report an experiment that asks whether people in a strategic situation behave according to the Go...
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Games and Economic Behav...
We show with a laboratory experiment that individuals adjust their moral principles to the situation...
We present an experiment on the behavior of individual subjects across four simple economic games: t...
The literature on social norms stresses that compliance with norms is approved while deviance is di...
The main contribution of this paper is twofold. First of all, it focuses on the decisional process t...
This thesis contributes to the research on other regarding preferences by experimental studies. Chap...
The short paper is a comment on some recent work by Charness and Rabin (Quarterly Journal of Economi...
Recent models of prosociality suggest that cooperation in laboratory games may be better understood ...
We investigate the motives behind reciprocal behavior by making selfish acts anonymous but not commo...
Using data on one-shot games, we investigate the assumption that players respond to underlying expec...
This paper puts three of the most prominent specifications of ‘other-regarding’ preferences to the e...
People consider fairness as well as their own interest when making decisions in economic games. The ...
The financial support from the Super Pump Priming Fund (currently named as RIS Fund) at the Universi...
We report an experiment that asks whether people in a strategic situation behave according to the Go...
We report an experiment that asks whether people in a strategic situation behave according to the Go...
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Games and Economic Behav...
We show with a laboratory experiment that individuals adjust their moral principles to the situation...
We present an experiment on the behavior of individual subjects across four simple economic games: t...
The literature on social norms stresses that compliance with norms is approved while deviance is di...
The main contribution of this paper is twofold. First of all, it focuses on the decisional process t...
This thesis contributes to the research on other regarding preferences by experimental studies. Chap...
The short paper is a comment on some recent work by Charness and Rabin (Quarterly Journal of Economi...
Recent models of prosociality suggest that cooperation in laboratory games may be better understood ...
We investigate the motives behind reciprocal behavior by making selfish acts anonymous but not commo...
Using data on one-shot games, we investigate the assumption that players respond to underlying expec...
This paper puts three of the most prominent specifications of ‘other-regarding’ preferences to the e...
People consider fairness as well as their own interest when making decisions in economic games. The ...