This commentary updates the paper ‘Excluding evidence (or staying proceedings) to vindicate rights in Irish and English law’ by analysing the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Ireland in DPP v JC. It argues that although the court has relaxed the exclusionary rule in one major respect, it has strengthened it in others, and that Ireland's approach to unconstitutionally or illegally obtained evidence remains very different from that of England and Wales
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
The right to silence, or the privilege against self-incrimination, has long been recognised as an im...
In response to problems encountered in the administration of justice in Northern Ireland, the Britis...
The 2015 Irish Supreme Court case of DPP v JC has been described as ‘the most astounding judgment ev...
In April 2015 the Irish Supreme Court held, in DPP v JC [2015] IESC 31, that the rather strict exclu...
In the arena of improperly obtained evidence the Irish courts have, for some time, operated one of t...
The constitutional duty of the Irish state ‘to defend and vindicate the personal rights of the citiz...
Introduction: The law on the admissibility of improperly obtained evidence in Ireland was first auth...
The changes to the Irish exclusionary rule introduced by the judgment in People (DPP) v JC mark an ...
Police procedures and practices in the investigation of crime are shaped by many things. One particu...
Ireland as a common law jurisdiction operates an adversarial system. Ireland has a written Constitut...
"Common law courts have differed on whether and to what extent an exclusionary rule should be used a...
Evidence is the lifeblood of a trial in the common law world and the admissibility of evidence in c...
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
The right to silence, or the privilege against self-incrimination, has long been recognised as an im...
In response to problems encountered in the administration of justice in Northern Ireland, the Britis...
The 2015 Irish Supreme Court case of DPP v JC has been described as ‘the most astounding judgment ev...
In April 2015 the Irish Supreme Court held, in DPP v JC [2015] IESC 31, that the rather strict exclu...
In the arena of improperly obtained evidence the Irish courts have, for some time, operated one of t...
The constitutional duty of the Irish state ‘to defend and vindicate the personal rights of the citiz...
Introduction: The law on the admissibility of improperly obtained evidence in Ireland was first auth...
The changes to the Irish exclusionary rule introduced by the judgment in People (DPP) v JC mark an ...
Police procedures and practices in the investigation of crime are shaped by many things. One particu...
Ireland as a common law jurisdiction operates an adversarial system. Ireland has a written Constitut...
"Common law courts have differed on whether and to what extent an exclusionary rule should be used a...
Evidence is the lifeblood of a trial in the common law world and the admissibility of evidence in c...
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
The right to silence, or the privilege against self-incrimination, has long been recognised as an im...
In response to problems encountered in the administration of justice in Northern Ireland, the Britis...