Economic Estimation of Broiler Breeding with Different Heating Systems in Stables

Cilj magistrske naloge je pripraviti finančno analizo za novogradnjo hleva za piščance pitance. Osredotočili smo se predvsem na različne sisteme ogrevanja hleva, medtem ko je gradbeni del v vseh analiziranih scenarijih enak. V analizo smo vključili devet različnih scenarijev, ki se med seboj razlikujejo le v načinu ogrevanja. Ločili smo jih glede na vir toplote (lesna biomasa, plin, elektrika), nato pa smo vsakemu energentu dodali ustrezne kombinacije načinov ogrevanja. Metodika naloge je razvoj simulacijskega modela, kjer se je v prvi fazi ocenila ekonomika vzreje brojlerjev ob različnih sistemih ogrevanja, v nadaljevanju pa še finančna analiza investicije. Izkazalo se je, da so med različnimi sistemi ogrevanja velike razlike in da moramo biti pozorni predvsem na opremo, s katero ogrevamo hlev. Najvišji koeficient ekonomičnosti smo ocenili v scenariju 4, in sicer 3,50, najnižjega pa v scenariju 5, kjer znaša 1,27. V nalogi smo ocenjevali tudi neto sedanjo vrednost (NSV), kjer je najnižja NSV ocenjena na 10 let in smo jo dobili pri scenarijih 3 in 4. Najvišja je v scenariju 5, kjer je vrednost NSV po 20 letih še vedno negativna.The aim of this master thesis is to financially evaluate the new build of broiler farm equipped with different heating systems. We have evaluated nine heating modes while keeping the same construction of the farm. We have used three different heat sources for nine heating modes. Heat sources were wood chips (biomass), fossil gas and electricity. The end result was a simulation model for evaluation of broiler breeding economics based on different heating systems and regimes. In addition to breeding economics we have also evaluated initial farm build and setup investment. Results from our simulation model show very high differences using different heating fuels and modes. The result shows that we need to pay special attention to the equipment we use for our farm heating. We have calculated the highest coefficient of economics in fourth heating mode (3,5), while mode five was the worst (1,27). We have also evaluated how fast will the farm pay itself off (net current value (NSV)). Farms with heating modes three and four pay off in ten years time while mode five doesn\u27t reach zero even in twenty years. As a result of this masters thesis, according to the data we have available, we suggest using wood biomass for heating in combination with underfloor heating for broiler breeding farm