Add to ORKGIt is proposed that since scientific output of individual researchers is not unidimensional, its popular measure, h-index, should be augmented with a measure of the average impact of the h top cited publications, i, that is basically independent of h. It is argued that the two metrics, h and i, reflect two separate facets of scientific output, the latter being little affected by seniorityPeer reviewe
the new index enjoys many good properties. In the discrete setting some small deviations from the id...
An individual’s h-index corresponds to the number h of his/her papers that each has at least h citat...
Use of the Hirsch-index (h) as measure of an author’s visibility in the scientific literature has be...
It is proposed that since scientific output of individual researchers is not unidimensional, its pop...
The ability to design an instrument sufficiently versatile to effectively gauge the impact of a scie...
We provide a comprehensive and critical review of the h-index and its most important modifications p...
Today, the h-index is a widely accepted indicator of sci-entific performance and has become a built-...
Author-level metrics are usually employed for academic promotion and research funding. The h-index i...
An individual’s h-index corresponds to the number h of his/her papers that each has at least h citat...
We apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information sc...
We propose a simple way to put in a common scale the h values of researchers working in different sc...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...
A new indicator for the assessment of the research performance of individual scientists was suggeste...
The use of quantitative indicators of scientific productivity seems now quite widespread for assessi...
Of all the bibliometric parameters, the h-index is the most widely used to gauge the academic produc...
the new index enjoys many good properties. In the discrete setting some small deviations from the id...
An individual’s h-index corresponds to the number h of his/her papers that each has at least h citat...
Use of the Hirsch-index (h) as measure of an author’s visibility in the scientific literature has be...
It is proposed that since scientific output of individual researchers is not unidimensional, its pop...
The ability to design an instrument sufficiently versatile to effectively gauge the impact of a scie...
We provide a comprehensive and critical review of the h-index and its most important modifications p...
Today, the h-index is a widely accepted indicator of sci-entific performance and has become a built-...
Author-level metrics are usually employed for academic promotion and research funding. The h-index i...
An individual’s h-index corresponds to the number h of his/her papers that each has at least h citat...
We apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information sc...
We propose a simple way to put in a common scale the h values of researchers working in different sc...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...
A new indicator for the assessment of the research performance of individual scientists was suggeste...
The use of quantitative indicators of scientific productivity seems now quite widespread for assessi...
Of all the bibliometric parameters, the h-index is the most widely used to gauge the academic produc...
the new index enjoys many good properties. In the discrete setting some small deviations from the id...
An individual’s h-index corresponds to the number h of his/her papers that each has at least h citat...
Use of the Hirsch-index (h) as measure of an author’s visibility in the scientific literature has be...