This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from minimal assumptions, namely the existence of involutions/daggers and kernels. The resulting structures turn out to (1) encompass many examples of interest, such as categories of relations, partial injections, Hilbert spaces (also modulo phase), and Boolean algebras, and (2) have interesting categorical/logical properties, in terms of kernel fibrations, such as existence of pullbacks, factorisation, and orthomodularity. For instance, the Sasaki hook and and-then connectives are obtained, as adjoints, via the existential-pullback adjunction between fibres
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
AbstractThis paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts ...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
AbstractThis paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts ...
This paper investigates dagger kernel categories which are considered first by Crown (J Nat Sci Math...
This paper investigates dagger kernel categories which are considered first by Crown (J Nat Sci Math...
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
AbstractThis paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts ...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
This paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts from min...
AbstractThis paper investigates quantum logic from the perspective of categorical logic, and starts ...
This paper investigates dagger kernel categories which are considered first by Crown (J Nat Sci Math...
This paper investigates dagger kernel categories which are considered first by Crown (J Nat Sci Math...
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:0902.2355 and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel...