Dutch holding and financing companies are subject to a specific tax loss compensation regime, the so-called holding company loss rule. In short, the purpose of this rule is the prevention of the compensation of losses resulting from holding and financing activities with profits from operational activities. This article concerns an evaluation of the rule from both a policy perspective and a tax-technical perspective. Several imbalances and inadequacies of the rule, in particular with respect to the application of the rule in cross-border situations, are highlighted
This paper examines the asset write-off behavior of loss firms in response to tax rule changes. In p...
This paper examines corporate tax avoidance involving Dutch special purpose entities (SPEs), or shel...
The article treats several recent developments in jurisprudence regarding the liability of company d...
In this article, the loss relief rules for companies established in the Netherlands are discussed in...
Most of the European Member States employ anti-loss trafficking rules. They aim to prevent the acqui...
As of 1 January 2012, the Dutch corporate income tax (CIT) system provides for international juridic...
The European Union today consists of 25 Member States. The Member States all have different tax syst...
The Dutch corporate tax act will probably be changed in order to limit the deductibility of liquidat...
The problem to be examined in this research is on the tax treatment of losses in cross border situat...
Globally, tax systems are continuously reviewed with a view to improving their fairness, equity and ...
textabstractAs of 1 January 2012, the Dutch corporate income tax (‘CIT’) system provides for interna...
The article treats several recent developments in jurisprudence regarding the liability of company d...
This paper examines the asset write-off behavior of loss firms in response to tax rule changes. In p...
Following recent court rulings, cross-border loss compensation for multinational firms will likely b...
In this edited book, Van Boom contributes to a pan-European survey of the legal ramifications of pur...
This paper examines the asset write-off behavior of loss firms in response to tax rule changes. In p...
This paper examines corporate tax avoidance involving Dutch special purpose entities (SPEs), or shel...
The article treats several recent developments in jurisprudence regarding the liability of company d...
In this article, the loss relief rules for companies established in the Netherlands are discussed in...
Most of the European Member States employ anti-loss trafficking rules. They aim to prevent the acqui...
As of 1 January 2012, the Dutch corporate income tax (CIT) system provides for international juridic...
The European Union today consists of 25 Member States. The Member States all have different tax syst...
The Dutch corporate tax act will probably be changed in order to limit the deductibility of liquidat...
The problem to be examined in this research is on the tax treatment of losses in cross border situat...
Globally, tax systems are continuously reviewed with a view to improving their fairness, equity and ...
textabstractAs of 1 January 2012, the Dutch corporate income tax (‘CIT’) system provides for interna...
The article treats several recent developments in jurisprudence regarding the liability of company d...
This paper examines the asset write-off behavior of loss firms in response to tax rule changes. In p...
Following recent court rulings, cross-border loss compensation for multinational firms will likely b...
In this edited book, Van Boom contributes to a pan-European survey of the legal ramifications of pur...
This paper examines the asset write-off behavior of loss firms in response to tax rule changes. In p...
This paper examines corporate tax avoidance involving Dutch special purpose entities (SPEs), or shel...
The article treats several recent developments in jurisprudence regarding the liability of company d...