If we are flâneurs, can we be cosmopolitans?

Walter Benjamin’s and Charles Baudelaire’s personage of the flaneur can be interpreted as a representation of the ambivalent attraction to the strange and unknown in the experience of anonymous city life, so characteristic for the modern age. To what extent can we interpret this role of the flaneur – given its essential qualities in these writings – as a representation of world citizenship? The thesis is that the flaneur is more a cosmopolitan in the cultural than in the moral sense of the term. To live up to the demanding moral ideal of world citizenship, the flaneur needs to change: from detached observation to more meaningful forms of inter-cultural engagement. Hence the flaneur offers some clues for the kind of ethos that is required for a cosmopolitan subjectivity as well as for how it falls short