The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the Discussion section. The line that currently reads "During this 4-week period while off PCSK9 monoclonal antibody therapy, the medical staff should ensure an accurate 4-week pill count of concurrently administered statin and/ or other lipid-altering drugs." should be changed to "During this 4-week stabilization period (while off PCSK9 monoclonal antibody therapy for at least 8 weeks), the medical staff should ensure an accurate 4-week pill count of concurrently administered statin and/or other lipid-altering drugs."
The original version of the article contained an error in Fig. 1b, which showed that 57/69 (78.3%) o...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Section “Results”, second pa...
In the original article, a few errors have been identified and subsequently rectified. In the abstra...
Abstract Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified a number of error...
In the Original Publication of the article, In Introduction part, 7th line, the value “5-100nM” has ...
Abstract The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The corr...
This Article contains errors. The colours in Figure 6B are inverted; the correct Figure 6 appears be...
The authors wish to make the following correction to their paper [1]. In the discussion section, the...
The name of Pau Montesinos was inadvertently presented as Pau Montesinos Fernández in the original a...
In the original version of this article, th...
Abstract The original article [1] contains an error in Fig. 3 whereby the trend lines denoting Low &...
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Acknowledgment s...
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper
In the above article [Cannavo A, Liccardo D, Lymperopoulos A, Gambino G, D’Amico ML, Rengo F, Koch W...
In the version of this article initially published, Figs. 5a,c and 6a were incorrect because of an e...
The original version of the article contained an error in Fig. 1b, which showed that 57/69 (78.3%) o...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Section “Results”, second pa...
In the original article, a few errors have been identified and subsequently rectified. In the abstra...
Abstract Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified a number of error...
In the Original Publication of the article, In Introduction part, 7th line, the value “5-100nM” has ...
Abstract The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The corr...
This Article contains errors. The colours in Figure 6B are inverted; the correct Figure 6 appears be...
The authors wish to make the following correction to their paper [1]. In the discussion section, the...
The name of Pau Montesinos was inadvertently presented as Pau Montesinos Fernández in the original a...
In the original version of this article, th...
Abstract The original article [1] contains an error in Fig. 3 whereby the trend lines denoting Low &...
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Acknowledgment s...
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper
In the above article [Cannavo A, Liccardo D, Lymperopoulos A, Gambino G, D’Amico ML, Rengo F, Koch W...
In the version of this article initially published, Figs. 5a,c and 6a were incorrect because of an e...
The original version of the article contained an error in Fig. 1b, which showed that 57/69 (78.3%) o...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Section “Results”, second pa...
In the original article, a few errors have been identified and subsequently rectified. In the abstra...