In Table 1 of this article, the numerical data were correct but the graphic part was imprecise
Notice of republication An incorrect version of Fig 3 was published in error. This article was repu...
In the original publication of the article, the authors have realized an error in Fig. 1. The correc...
Because of a technical error, the code corresponding to the outcome for the Basir et al. cohort was ...
In Table 1 of this article, the numerical data were correct but the graphic part was imprecise
Correction: Intensive Care Medicine https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07180-y When this article was...
Correction to: Intensive Care Med (2016) 42:1865-1876 DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-5
Correction to: Intensive Care Med (2016) 42:1865-1876 DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-5
Correction to: Intensive Care Med (2016) 42:1865\u20131876 DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-
Unfortunately, the original article [1] contained some errors. The table title of Tables 4, 5, 6, 7 ...
In the original publication of this article [1], a formula’s format in the section of “Sample size c...
Following the publication of this article [1], the authors reported a number of errors which are giv...
Following the publication of this article [1], the authors reported a number of errors which are giv...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The penultimate row of Table...
International audienceThis article was updated to replace an incorrect version that was published du...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Tri...
Notice of republication An incorrect version of Fig 3 was published in error. This article was repu...
In the original publication of the article, the authors have realized an error in Fig. 1. The correc...
Because of a technical error, the code corresponding to the outcome for the Basir et al. cohort was ...
In Table 1 of this article, the numerical data were correct but the graphic part was imprecise
Correction: Intensive Care Medicine https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07180-y When this article was...
Correction to: Intensive Care Med (2016) 42:1865-1876 DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-5
Correction to: Intensive Care Med (2016) 42:1865-1876 DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-5
Correction to: Intensive Care Med (2016) 42:1865\u20131876 DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-
Unfortunately, the original article [1] contained some errors. The table title of Tables 4, 5, 6, 7 ...
In the original publication of this article [1], a formula’s format in the section of “Sample size c...
Following the publication of this article [1], the authors reported a number of errors which are giv...
Following the publication of this article [1], the authors reported a number of errors which are giv...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The penultimate row of Table...
International audienceThis article was updated to replace an incorrect version that was published du...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Tri...
Notice of republication An incorrect version of Fig 3 was published in error. This article was repu...
In the original publication of the article, the authors have realized an error in Fig. 1. The correc...
Because of a technical error, the code corresponding to the outcome for the Basir et al. cohort was ...