What are the usual assessment practices in adult non-progressive dysarthria rehabilitation? A survey of Australian dysarthria practice patterns

This aim of this study was to identify assessment practices for non-progressive dysarthria used by Australian speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and to describe these practices within the framework of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning Disability, and Health (ICF). A 23-item online survey was distributed to Australian SLPs, with 56 responses suitable for data analysis. The majority of SLPs prescribed ‘high importance’ to the assessment of impairment to speech function (96%, n = 54), activity limitations (91%, n = 51) and participation in society (91%, n = 51) in non-progressive dysarthria. However, reported assessment selection for non-progressive dysarthria focused largely on impairment and intelligibility, with assessments addressing participation restrictions being under-utilised. There was also a preference for informal assessment tools across all ICF domains. Over half (69%, n = 37) indicated that current assessment tools for non-progressive dysarthria generally do not meet their needs, with key issues being time-factors and inadequate sensitivity. There was variability in the use of outcome measures for non-progressive dysarthria, with workplace setting, time constraints and a perceived lack of relevance being the most commonly reported barriers to implementation