Properties of argumentation semantics have been widely studied in the last decades. However, there has been no investigation on the question of difference measures between semantics. Such measures turn helpful when the semantics associated to an argumentation framework may have to be changed, in a way that ensures that the new semantics is not too dissimilar from the old one. Three main notions of difference measures between semantics are defined in this paper. Some of these measures are shown to be distances or semi-distances
Abstract. In this work we complement recent investigations of the intertranslata-bility of argumenta...
AbstractThe issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been consi...
International audienceArgumentation is a prominent approach for reasoning with (inconsistent) propos...
International audienceProperties of argumentation semantics have been widely studied in the last dec...
peer reviewedAn argumentation framework can be seen as expressing, in an abstract way, the conflicti...
Argumentation reasoning is a way for agents to evaluate a situation. Given a framework made of confl...
Argumentation is a prominent approach for reasoning with (inconsistent) propositional information....
AbstractThe increasing variety of semantics proposed in the context of Dung's theory of argumentatio...
Abstract. Understanding the expressiveness of a formalism is undoubtedly an important part of unders...
The increasing variety of semantics proposed in the context of Dung’s theory of argumentation makes ...
Argumentation is a reasoning model based on the justification of claims by arguments. Often, argumen...
International audienceRecently, the notion of similarity between arguments, namely those built using...
This paper presents an overview on the state of the art of semantics for abstract argumentation, cov...
Abstract. This paper provides a preliminary investigation to-wards the definition of a general frame...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Abstract. In this work we complement recent investigations of the intertranslata-bility of argumenta...
AbstractThe issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been consi...
International audienceArgumentation is a prominent approach for reasoning with (inconsistent) propos...
International audienceProperties of argumentation semantics have been widely studied in the last dec...
peer reviewedAn argumentation framework can be seen as expressing, in an abstract way, the conflicti...
Argumentation reasoning is a way for agents to evaluate a situation. Given a framework made of confl...
Argumentation is a prominent approach for reasoning with (inconsistent) propositional information....
AbstractThe increasing variety of semantics proposed in the context of Dung's theory of argumentatio...
Abstract. Understanding the expressiveness of a formalism is undoubtedly an important part of unders...
The increasing variety of semantics proposed in the context of Dung’s theory of argumentation makes ...
Argumentation is a reasoning model based on the justification of claims by arguments. Often, argumen...
International audienceRecently, the notion of similarity between arguments, namely those built using...
This paper presents an overview on the state of the art of semantics for abstract argumentation, cov...
Abstract. This paper provides a preliminary investigation to-wards the definition of a general frame...
Argumentation is the process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them c...
Abstract. In this work we complement recent investigations of the intertranslata-bility of argumenta...
AbstractThe issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been consi...
International audienceArgumentation is a prominent approach for reasoning with (inconsistent) propos...