Add to ORKGAs the analysis in this chapter has shown, there are at least three ways in which a different outcome in the Evans -case can be justified. Each of these scenarios relates to one of the steps in the three-step test for addressing conflicts between Convention rights..
The Evans decisions are important as the first major European contributions to the growing global le...
In the present chapter, objections to antidiscrimination in the name of conscience or religion are e...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
Discusses the apparent incompatibility between interpretations of the UN Convention on the Rights of...
This article explores the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the decision making of the House of...
IT is trite law that good reasons must be given to justify infringements of fundamental rights prote...
Use of the representative parties rule in England and Australia has been stifled by restrictive inte...
An answer to the topical inquiry is A great deal but full explanation of the general answer to a v...
The recent case of Evans v United Kingdom1 documents a personal tragedy for Natallie Evans and an un...
Much of the literature on the three-step test focuses on its implementation in relation to one parti...
There have been remarkable developments in some areas of discrimination law in the United Kingdom ov...
[Abstract]: The issue of which law to apply to resolve a tort case comprising elements from more tha...
This article discusses different approaches that courts have used in deciding on the applicable law ...
Abstract. The rules under which the UK Boundary Commissions operate are imprecise in their wording, ...
In the current debate on flexibility in the area of exceptions and limitations (E & Ls) to intel...
The Evans decisions are important as the first major European contributions to the growing global le...
In the present chapter, objections to antidiscrimination in the name of conscience or religion are e...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
Discusses the apparent incompatibility between interpretations of the UN Convention on the Rights of...
This article explores the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the decision making of the House of...
IT is trite law that good reasons must be given to justify infringements of fundamental rights prote...
Use of the representative parties rule in England and Australia has been stifled by restrictive inte...
An answer to the topical inquiry is A great deal but full explanation of the general answer to a v...
The recent case of Evans v United Kingdom1 documents a personal tragedy for Natallie Evans and an un...
Much of the literature on the three-step test focuses on its implementation in relation to one parti...
There have been remarkable developments in some areas of discrimination law in the United Kingdom ov...
[Abstract]: The issue of which law to apply to resolve a tort case comprising elements from more tha...
This article discusses different approaches that courts have used in deciding on the applicable law ...
Abstract. The rules under which the UK Boundary Commissions operate are imprecise in their wording, ...
In the current debate on flexibility in the area of exceptions and limitations (E & Ls) to intel...
The Evans decisions are important as the first major European contributions to the growing global le...
In the present chapter, objections to antidiscrimination in the name of conscience or religion are e...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...