Add to ORKGOn 27 January 2014, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered its judgment on the maritime boundary dispute between Peru and Chile (Peru v. Chile, Judgment, General List No. 137). The Court had to determine first whether a maritime boundary existed between Peru and Chile. If so, then it also had to consider the nature and extent of the boundary.Full Tex
The International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea\u27s March 2012 Judgment in the Bay of Bengal Case ...
The International Court of Justice\u27s May 2008 decision to award Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh to ...
This is the latest in a series of annual surveys reviewing dispute settlement in the law of the sea,...
The ICJ’s decision addresses facts and themes related to the question whether or not a maritime bou...
The origins of the maritime dispute between Chile and Peru go back to 1952, when these countries, al...
In2014,the International Court of Justice rendered its judgment on matters submitted to it by...
This commentary to the judgment of the International Court of Justice of 27 January 2014 on the mari...
The judgment pronounced on the 27th of January 2014 by the International Court of Justice on the mar...
On January 27, 2014 the International Court of Justice, principal judicial organ of the United Natio...
According to Articles 74(1) and 83(1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS...
In 2015, the International Court of Justice ruled that Bolivia’s claim against Chile could proceed t...
This commentary to the judgment of the International Court of Justice of 27 January2014 on the marit...
With the aim of barring the Nicaragua’s fresh request for the delimitation of the continental shelf ...
Abstract: The Laguna del Desierto arbitration determined the demarcation of the section of the Arge...
Since territorial boundaries are considered to remain untouched, the delimitation of maritime bounda...
The International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea\u27s March 2012 Judgment in the Bay of Bengal Case ...
The International Court of Justice\u27s May 2008 decision to award Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh to ...
This is the latest in a series of annual surveys reviewing dispute settlement in the law of the sea,...
The ICJ’s decision addresses facts and themes related to the question whether or not a maritime bou...
The origins of the maritime dispute between Chile and Peru go back to 1952, when these countries, al...
In2014,the International Court of Justice rendered its judgment on matters submitted to it by...
This commentary to the judgment of the International Court of Justice of 27 January 2014 on the mari...
The judgment pronounced on the 27th of January 2014 by the International Court of Justice on the mar...
On January 27, 2014 the International Court of Justice, principal judicial organ of the United Natio...
According to Articles 74(1) and 83(1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS...
In 2015, the International Court of Justice ruled that Bolivia’s claim against Chile could proceed t...
This commentary to the judgment of the International Court of Justice of 27 January2014 on the marit...
With the aim of barring the Nicaragua’s fresh request for the delimitation of the continental shelf ...
Abstract: The Laguna del Desierto arbitration determined the demarcation of the section of the Arge...
Since territorial boundaries are considered to remain untouched, the delimitation of maritime bounda...
The International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea\u27s March 2012 Judgment in the Bay of Bengal Case ...
The International Court of Justice\u27s May 2008 decision to award Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh to ...
This is the latest in a series of annual surveys reviewing dispute settlement in the law of the sea,...