Add to ORKGI. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though Inadequate Verdicts … A. Nominal Verdicts in General … B. Substantial though Inadequate Verdicts IV. Federal Law V. New Trial Damages Only … A. The State Courts … B. The Federal Courts VI. The Additur VII. Conclusio
Plaintiff instituted this action for breach of contract and defendant counterclaimed. Neither party ...
In reviewing an award various factors before it can determine whether the award is so excessive that...
In an article written three years ago, this author introduced the subject with the observation that,...
I. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though...
There is no mystery in the language which courts from time immemorial expressed in an attempt to exp...
In an action against the manufacturer for damages caused by a defect in an automobile, the jury retu...
The practice of granting new trials because the verdict is excessive was well established at common ...
Of the several grounds for a new trial in Washington, one in particular has created considerable dif...
P sued D for malpractice. After a verdict for P, the trial court granted D\u27s motion for new trial...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the p...
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
It would seem a truism to state that the object of courts of justice is to do justice between the pa...
The practice of granting new trials because the verdict is excessive was well established at common ...
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages arising from personal injuries claimed to have been suff...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a jury\u27s failure to award damages for pain and suffering...
Plaintiff instituted this action for breach of contract and defendant counterclaimed. Neither party ...
In reviewing an award various factors before it can determine whether the award is so excessive that...
In an article written three years ago, this author introduced the subject with the observation that,...
I. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though...
There is no mystery in the language which courts from time immemorial expressed in an attempt to exp...
In an action against the manufacturer for damages caused by a defect in an automobile, the jury retu...
The practice of granting new trials because the verdict is excessive was well established at common ...
Of the several grounds for a new trial in Washington, one in particular has created considerable dif...
P sued D for malpractice. After a verdict for P, the trial court granted D\u27s motion for new trial...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the p...
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
It would seem a truism to state that the object of courts of justice is to do justice between the pa...
The practice of granting new trials because the verdict is excessive was well established at common ...
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages arising from personal injuries claimed to have been suff...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a jury\u27s failure to award damages for pain and suffering...
Plaintiff instituted this action for breach of contract and defendant counterclaimed. Neither party ...
In reviewing an award various factors before it can determine whether the award is so excessive that...
In an article written three years ago, this author introduced the subject with the observation that,...