In 1951, the Nebraska Legislature enacted a summary judgment procedure for the state, patterned after Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This article examines the grounds for application of the procedure, discusses its relationship with the other pre-trial motions presently available, and analyzes the relative success of summary judgment as a pre-trial procedure in Nebraska in the thirteen years since its inception. I. Introduction II. Grounds for Summary Judgment III. How the Court Decides Whether There Is an Issue … A. The Movant’s Position … B. Opposing Party’s Position … C. The Court’s Position … D. The Partial Summary Judgment IV. Appeal V. Other Pre-Trial Procedures Available, and Their Relation to Summary Judgment … A. ...
In modern civil litigation, disputes rarely proceed to trial. Summary judgment has evolved in state...
Since its inception nearly ten years ago, the summary jury trial has received almost unanimous accla...
This article considers the historical development of the summary judgment procedure, both in England...
In 1951, the Nebraska Legislature enacted a summary judgment procedure for the state, patterned afte...
Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure introduced to federal practice the summary judgment ...
In general, summary judgment procedure may be used to determine what need exists for a trial, accord...
City State Bank v. Holstine fundamentally changed summary judgment law in Nebraska. The Holstine dec...
Summary judgment today is what settlement was twenty-five years ago: an increasingly popular and imp...
The Green v. Village of Terrytown case presented to the Supreme Court of Nebraska for the first time...
feature of the most modern practice systems. Under this procedure judgment may be entered summarily ...
This essay addresses one particular challenge to federal summary judgment practice: the possibility ...
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that, under appropriate circumstances, either the plain...
Summary judgment, long a centerpiece of federal procedural practice, is at something of a crossroad...
The article focuses on the overview of summary judgment, the process for making the motion, and the ...
The Green v. Village of Terrytown case presented to the Supreme Court of Nebraska for the first time...
In modern civil litigation, disputes rarely proceed to trial. Summary judgment has evolved in state...
Since its inception nearly ten years ago, the summary jury trial has received almost unanimous accla...
This article considers the historical development of the summary judgment procedure, both in England...
In 1951, the Nebraska Legislature enacted a summary judgment procedure for the state, patterned afte...
Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure introduced to federal practice the summary judgment ...
In general, summary judgment procedure may be used to determine what need exists for a trial, accord...
City State Bank v. Holstine fundamentally changed summary judgment law in Nebraska. The Holstine dec...
Summary judgment today is what settlement was twenty-five years ago: an increasingly popular and imp...
The Green v. Village of Terrytown case presented to the Supreme Court of Nebraska for the first time...
feature of the most modern practice systems. Under this procedure judgment may be entered summarily ...
This essay addresses one particular challenge to federal summary judgment practice: the possibility ...
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that, under appropriate circumstances, either the plain...
Summary judgment, long a centerpiece of federal procedural practice, is at something of a crossroad...
The article focuses on the overview of summary judgment, the process for making the motion, and the ...
The Green v. Village of Terrytown case presented to the Supreme Court of Nebraska for the first time...
In modern civil litigation, disputes rarely proceed to trial. Summary judgment has evolved in state...
Since its inception nearly ten years ago, the summary jury trial has received almost unanimous accla...
This article considers the historical development of the summary judgment procedure, both in England...