Add to ORKGThis article discusses two sections of the Federal and Nebraska Rules: (1) cross-examination of parties and witnesses and (2) a party\u27s right to impeach a witness called by the party. I. Introduction II. The Advisory Committee III. Cross-Examination of Parties and Witnesses IV. A Party’s Right to Impeach His Own Witness V. Conclusio
Rule 609 of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows a party to impeach a witness with his or her prior ...
The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence (the Rules) resulted in a more liberal standard for th...
Let\u27s start with how federal sausage is made. Recently, I read that the chief policymaking body s...
This article discusses two sections of the Federal and Nebraska Rules: (1) cross-examination of part...
On August 24, 1975, new rules of evidence became effective in Nebraska courts. Known officially as t...
I. Introduction II. The Basic Exclusionary Principle … A. Rationale, Common Law Origins, Scope … B. ...
It has long been an established rule of courtroom procedure that a party calling a witness is prohib...
Introduction Rule 601: General Rule of Competency Rule 602: Lack of Personal Knowledge Rule 603: Oat...
In this Article, Professor Underwood discusses the varying application of Rule 615 of the Federal Ru...
This is a micro study of federalism in action. This study identifies, ranks, and evaluates the curre...
The author examines the Pennsylvania and federal rules governing the use of a witness\u27 prior crim...
With the publication last March of the preliminary draft of the rules of evidence for the lower fede...
The rules contained in Article VII, Opinion and Expert Testimony, of the Proposed Nebraska Rules o...
It is the thesis of this article that under the federal rules there are basically only two limitatio...
In analyzing the proposed Federal Rules of Evidence, the drafting work of the Advisory Committee sho...
Rule 609 of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows a party to impeach a witness with his or her prior ...
The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence (the Rules) resulted in a more liberal standard for th...
Let\u27s start with how federal sausage is made. Recently, I read that the chief policymaking body s...
This article discusses two sections of the Federal and Nebraska Rules: (1) cross-examination of part...
On August 24, 1975, new rules of evidence became effective in Nebraska courts. Known officially as t...
I. Introduction II. The Basic Exclusionary Principle … A. Rationale, Common Law Origins, Scope … B. ...
It has long been an established rule of courtroom procedure that a party calling a witness is prohib...
Introduction Rule 601: General Rule of Competency Rule 602: Lack of Personal Knowledge Rule 603: Oat...
In this Article, Professor Underwood discusses the varying application of Rule 615 of the Federal Ru...
This is a micro study of federalism in action. This study identifies, ranks, and evaluates the curre...
The author examines the Pennsylvania and federal rules governing the use of a witness\u27 prior crim...
With the publication last March of the preliminary draft of the rules of evidence for the lower fede...
The rules contained in Article VII, Opinion and Expert Testimony, of the Proposed Nebraska Rules o...
It is the thesis of this article that under the federal rules there are basically only two limitatio...
In analyzing the proposed Federal Rules of Evidence, the drafting work of the Advisory Committee sho...
Rule 609 of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows a party to impeach a witness with his or her prior ...
The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence (the Rules) resulted in a more liberal standard for th...
Let\u27s start with how federal sausage is made. Recently, I read that the chief policymaking body s...