This Note first addresses the facts of the Nebraska Court of Appeals decision in Meyer v. Board of Regents and then generally discusses the Nebraska Public Meetings Law. Specific holdings of Meyer are critiqued. The final parts of this Note consist of two features. First, in order to assist practitioners, the author suggests procedures for public entity negotiations that should avoid most Nebraska Public Meetings Law violations. Second, the author suggests that the holding in Meyer can best be explained by the court\u27s concern for the real-world consequences and dangerous precedential value that would have been set if the court would have invalidated the actions taken by the Board of Regents. In the final analysis, such result-oriented de...
I. Introduction II. Rule 3, Section 15 of the Rules of the Nebraska Unicameral Violates the State\u2...
In recent years, the traditional common law rule known as “employment at will,” has come under attac...
The 1975 session of the Nebraska Unicameral probably will be asked to consider the Proposed Nebraska...
This NebFact discusses Nebraska state statute 84-1408 which relates to the open meeting law
In December 13-15, 1987, the Nebraska Unicameral conducted a symposium for its members to address th...
The class action represents an exception to the fundamental legal principle that one is not bound b...
This Note first presents the factual background of the caretaker relative medical assistance program...
The Nebraska Law Review is pleased to introduce in this issue a section devoted exclusively to recen...
Nebraska Governor Val Peterson told a Lincoln audience that unless the government of the State of Ne...
This Technical Bulletin discusses the Tennessee Public Meeting Law - better known as the Sunshine La...
Regulation of lawyer conduct in the State of Nebraska. Upon the Nebraska Supreme Court\u27s adoption...
With increased growth and mobility in the legal profession, attorney conflicts of interest have also...
I. Introduction . . . . . 313 II. General Applicability to Trusts Created before January 1, 2005 . ....
I. Introduction II. The State v. Arnold Decision ... A. The Arnold Facts ... B. The Arnold Decision ...
City State Bank v. Holstine fundamentally changed summary judgment law in Nebraska. The Holstine dec...
I. Introduction II. Rule 3, Section 15 of the Rules of the Nebraska Unicameral Violates the State\u2...
In recent years, the traditional common law rule known as “employment at will,” has come under attac...
The 1975 session of the Nebraska Unicameral probably will be asked to consider the Proposed Nebraska...
This NebFact discusses Nebraska state statute 84-1408 which relates to the open meeting law
In December 13-15, 1987, the Nebraska Unicameral conducted a symposium for its members to address th...
The class action represents an exception to the fundamental legal principle that one is not bound b...
This Note first presents the factual background of the caretaker relative medical assistance program...
The Nebraska Law Review is pleased to introduce in this issue a section devoted exclusively to recen...
Nebraska Governor Val Peterson told a Lincoln audience that unless the government of the State of Ne...
This Technical Bulletin discusses the Tennessee Public Meeting Law - better known as the Sunshine La...
Regulation of lawyer conduct in the State of Nebraska. Upon the Nebraska Supreme Court\u27s adoption...
With increased growth and mobility in the legal profession, attorney conflicts of interest have also...
I. Introduction . . . . . 313 II. General Applicability to Trusts Created before January 1, 2005 . ....
I. Introduction II. The State v. Arnold Decision ... A. The Arnold Facts ... B. The Arnold Decision ...
City State Bank v. Holstine fundamentally changed summary judgment law in Nebraska. The Holstine dec...
I. Introduction II. Rule 3, Section 15 of the Rules of the Nebraska Unicameral Violates the State\u2...
In recent years, the traditional common law rule known as “employment at will,” has come under attac...
The 1975 session of the Nebraska Unicameral probably will be asked to consider the Proposed Nebraska...