A qualitative paradigm was used to study 58 jurors from six civil jury trials involving a corporate defendant. The purpose of the study was to generate a grounded theory of juridic decision-making by incorporating the perspectives of the individual jurors and the dynamics of the jury trial process. The data included juror interviews, field notes, and naturalistic observations of the juridic process which occurred over a four year period. A grounded theory of juror decision-making consisting of five stages and three mediating constraints was generated through an analytic induction method of data analysis and was reported in the literature for the first time. The five stages of juror decision-making were: Stage 1 Formulation of the Story; Sta...
Inside the Juror presents the most interesting and sophisticated work to date on juror decision maki...
There has been a great deal of research in the area of jury behavior in the criminal justice system....
This study aims to identify whether a model of juror decision-making (i.e. the threshold point model...
Considerable evidence has been gathered from studies of "jury-like" decision-making suggesting that ...
The question of when and how jurors form opinions about evidence presented at trial has been the foc...
Much of the extant research on jury decision making has been conducted at the juror level, examining...
Purpose: To develop and validate a self-report measure of individual juror decision making within c...
Much of the extant research on jury decision making has been conducted at the juror level, examining...
The civil jury has been under attack in recent years for being unreliable and incompetent. Consideri...
A brief review of psychological theories of juror decision making is followed by an introduction to ...
Each year in the United States there are over 150,000 jury trials. Theoretically, the jury serves as...
This study examined the following question: How well will a predictor of an individual juror's decis...
Whilst jury trials are widely considered to be a fairer way of deciding whether an accused person is...
Two experiments examined individual and group decision mak-ing when decision criteria led to outcome...
Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1) assess ...
Inside the Juror presents the most interesting and sophisticated work to date on juror decision maki...
There has been a great deal of research in the area of jury behavior in the criminal justice system....
This study aims to identify whether a model of juror decision-making (i.e. the threshold point model...
Considerable evidence has been gathered from studies of "jury-like" decision-making suggesting that ...
The question of when and how jurors form opinions about evidence presented at trial has been the foc...
Much of the extant research on jury decision making has been conducted at the juror level, examining...
Purpose: To develop and validate a self-report measure of individual juror decision making within c...
Much of the extant research on jury decision making has been conducted at the juror level, examining...
The civil jury has been under attack in recent years for being unreliable and incompetent. Consideri...
A brief review of psychological theories of juror decision making is followed by an introduction to ...
Each year in the United States there are over 150,000 jury trials. Theoretically, the jury serves as...
This study examined the following question: How well will a predictor of an individual juror's decis...
Whilst jury trials are widely considered to be a fairer way of deciding whether an accused person is...
Two experiments examined individual and group decision mak-ing when decision criteria led to outcome...
Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1) assess ...
Inside the Juror presents the most interesting and sophisticated work to date on juror decision maki...
There has been a great deal of research in the area of jury behavior in the criminal justice system....
This study aims to identify whether a model of juror decision-making (i.e. the threshold point model...