In October 2000, 90 of the 100 appellate and supreme court justices of California were attending their annual appellate institute when Bryan Garner lectured on judicial writing and proposed dropping citations into footnotes. Garner was persuasive and when he announced his “altar call” through a show of hands of judges that were willing to change, I, along with a clear majority of those present, indicated that we were. Yet, a year after that institute only five of us have adopted Garner’s suggestion. I believe I know why
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of un...
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of un...
T his issue features our annual review of the past Term’s decisions of the United States Supreme Cou...
In October 2000, 90 of the 100 appellate and supreme court justices of California were attending the...
That said, Judge Posner’s response here is off the mark (he doesn’t distinguish citational from subs...
In early July, when I opened the Sunday New York Times, I was surprised to see a front- page article...
Ipropose that judges, in their opinions, put citations in footnotes and generally abstain from using...
The obvious objection to footnotes is that they force the reader to interrupt the reading of the tex...
Our issue begins with Judge Procter Hug, Jr.’s thoughts on judicial independence under pressure. We ...
In the lead article in this issue, court consultant Roger Hanson examines the implications of the ch...
We begin the issue with Professor Chuck Weisselberg’s annual review of the past year’s criminal deci...
Although our legal system is the envy of much of the world, we hear much criticism in our own countr...
One of the great things about editing the journal of the American Judges Association is that you can...
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of un...
Reactions to the lead article in this issue may vary greatly. Some will find its conclusions surpris...
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of un...
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of un...
T his issue features our annual review of the past Term’s decisions of the United States Supreme Cou...
In October 2000, 90 of the 100 appellate and supreme court justices of California were attending the...
That said, Judge Posner’s response here is off the mark (he doesn’t distinguish citational from subs...
In early July, when I opened the Sunday New York Times, I was surprised to see a front- page article...
Ipropose that judges, in their opinions, put citations in footnotes and generally abstain from using...
The obvious objection to footnotes is that they force the reader to interrupt the reading of the tex...
Our issue begins with Judge Procter Hug, Jr.’s thoughts on judicial independence under pressure. We ...
In the lead article in this issue, court consultant Roger Hanson examines the implications of the ch...
We begin the issue with Professor Chuck Weisselberg’s annual review of the past year’s criminal deci...
Although our legal system is the envy of much of the world, we hear much criticism in our own countr...
One of the great things about editing the journal of the American Judges Association is that you can...
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of un...
Reactions to the lead article in this issue may vary greatly. Some will find its conclusions surpris...
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of un...
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of un...
T his issue features our annual review of the past Term’s decisions of the United States Supreme Cou...