Europe 2020 and the fight against poverty : beyond competence clash, towards “hybrid” governance solutions?

The supranational strategy \u201cEurope 2020\u201d came along with two main novelties for social policy coordination in the EU: a quantified poverty reduction target and a new governance framework \u2013 the \u201cEuropean Semester\u201d. In the aim of assessing the effectiveness of the novel strategy in prompting the emergence of a European(-ized) anti-poverty arena - thus inherently multilevel and multi-stakeholder, as well as integrated (across policy sectors) \u2013 the article first presents the strategy evolution at the supranational level in 2011-14. Then it analyzes its implementation in five Members States - Germany, Italy, Poland, Sweden and UK - through the first four annual cycles. By posing the analytical focus on processes \u2013 rather than outcomes \u2013 in order to capture the domestic changes produced by the Europe 2020 anti-poverty strategy, the article argues that the latter marked significant discontinuity with the Social Inclusion-OMC. The new strategy increased the political salience of the poverty issue both at the supranational level and in the selected MS, while leading to a \u201ccompetence clash\u201d between national governments and the EU in Germany, Sweden and UK. The emergence of such main line of tension substantially constrained the Europe 2020 potential in these three countries. Differently, in Italy and Poland, the implementation was smoother and the effects along the participation and integration dimensions were more evident. We contend that national policy legacies, the relevance of EU social funds, as well as partisan preferences help explaining the differential effects of Europe 2020. In conclusion, the article also suggests that recent decisions at the EU level might eventually bring European anti-poverty coordination beyond soft-law towards \u201chybrid\u201d governance solutions