Add to ORKGAn essay on the so called essential contestability of concepts and its implications for political and legal philosophy
(Excerpt) This Essay highlights the importance of comparative legal analysis with particular emphasi...
There are at least four reasons why one might expect differences between the philosophies one would ...
Legal positivism is an incoherent intellectual enterprise. It sets itself an explanatory task which ...
Evaluative and normative terms and concepts are often said to be "essentially contestable". This not...
markdownabstractSince Gallie introduced the notion of essentially contested concepts, it has given r...
I argue that law is not best considered an essentially contested concept. After first explaining the...
“Since the term was coined by W. B. Gallie, the idea of essentially contested concepts has been used...
This book makes an original contribution to research in presenting the discipline of jurisprudence n...
ABSTRACT Conceptual confusion has long been a source of difficulty in the study of politics. W. B. G...
Imagine widespread consensus regarding the good and the bad, the right and the wrong, the just and t...
In this essay, I discuss the merits of contestability in contrast with consent as a meansof legitimi...
This study examines W.B. Gallie’s claim that a special group of concepts, i.e., essentially conteste...
This timely and assured book provides a unique guide to critical legal studies which is one of the m...
Normative concepts are said to lead to controversial discussions and involve indefinite and valuable...
Book synopsis: This timely and assured book provides a unique guide to critical legal studies which ...
(Excerpt) This Essay highlights the importance of comparative legal analysis with particular emphasi...
There are at least four reasons why one might expect differences between the philosophies one would ...
Legal positivism is an incoherent intellectual enterprise. It sets itself an explanatory task which ...
Evaluative and normative terms and concepts are often said to be "essentially contestable". This not...
markdownabstractSince Gallie introduced the notion of essentially contested concepts, it has given r...
I argue that law is not best considered an essentially contested concept. After first explaining the...
“Since the term was coined by W. B. Gallie, the idea of essentially contested concepts has been used...
This book makes an original contribution to research in presenting the discipline of jurisprudence n...
ABSTRACT Conceptual confusion has long been a source of difficulty in the study of politics. W. B. G...
Imagine widespread consensus regarding the good and the bad, the right and the wrong, the just and t...
In this essay, I discuss the merits of contestability in contrast with consent as a meansof legitimi...
This study examines W.B. Gallie’s claim that a special group of concepts, i.e., essentially conteste...
This timely and assured book provides a unique guide to critical legal studies which is one of the m...
Normative concepts are said to lead to controversial discussions and involve indefinite and valuable...
Book synopsis: This timely and assured book provides a unique guide to critical legal studies which ...
(Excerpt) This Essay highlights the importance of comparative legal analysis with particular emphasi...
There are at least four reasons why one might expect differences between the philosophies one would ...
Legal positivism is an incoherent intellectual enterprise. It sets itself an explanatory task which ...