This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available electronically via Westlaw UK.For seventy years, debates in the European patent community have centred on the introduction of a unitary patent system. For an efficient and effective European patent system, there are two key aspects – the promotion of harmonisation and the consideration of wider societal implications. In considering these two key aspects, this article focuses on the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Unitary Patent Package (UPP) and the added complication of Brexit. In doing so, it examines the relevant institutional issues that have arisen in the lead up to the finalisation of the UPP, which continue to cause issues as...
After decades of futile attempts to establish a comprehensive European patent framework, we will soo...
This article discusses the need of a Unified Patent Court, as a major contribution for the implement...
In my first article (GRUR Int. 2017, 301 and Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2017)...
Developing a unitary patent system for Europe has been debated for over 50 years but never achieved...
Developing a unitary patent system for Europe has been debated for over 50 years but never achieved....
This paper addresses as EU patent the “European patent with unitary effect”, and concludes that 1) t...
Europe’s Unified Patent Court would be the culminations of decades of work towards a single forum to...
This paper examines the areas of patent law and copyright law in the context of Britain’s exit from ...
188-199New development in terms of Unitary Patent Protection (UPP) system in Europe is anticipated b...
Following the Brexit vote on 23 June 2016, chances of the UK ratifying the Agreement on a Unified Pa...
For over forty years, European countries have held numerous conferences and signed multiple internat...
The paper concludes in particular that 1) the EU patent applies only to the EU territory; 2) the ins...
Although patent litigation in Europe is fragmented, businesses have been able to cope and a unitary ...
As of 1st of June 2023, after years of negotiations, setbacks and postponements, the Unitary Patent ...
Brexit raises a number of difficult questions with regard to intellectual property rights in a post-...
After decades of futile attempts to establish a comprehensive European patent framework, we will soo...
This article discusses the need of a Unified Patent Court, as a major contribution for the implement...
In my first article (GRUR Int. 2017, 301 and Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2017)...
Developing a unitary patent system for Europe has been debated for over 50 years but never achieved...
Developing a unitary patent system for Europe has been debated for over 50 years but never achieved....
This paper addresses as EU patent the “European patent with unitary effect”, and concludes that 1) t...
Europe’s Unified Patent Court would be the culminations of decades of work towards a single forum to...
This paper examines the areas of patent law and copyright law in the context of Britain’s exit from ...
188-199New development in terms of Unitary Patent Protection (UPP) system in Europe is anticipated b...
Following the Brexit vote on 23 June 2016, chances of the UK ratifying the Agreement on a Unified Pa...
For over forty years, European countries have held numerous conferences and signed multiple internat...
The paper concludes in particular that 1) the EU patent applies only to the EU territory; 2) the ins...
Although patent litigation in Europe is fragmented, businesses have been able to cope and a unitary ...
As of 1st of June 2023, after years of negotiations, setbacks and postponements, the Unitary Patent ...
Brexit raises a number of difficult questions with regard to intellectual property rights in a post-...
After decades of futile attempts to establish a comprehensive European patent framework, we will soo...
This article discusses the need of a Unified Patent Court, as a major contribution for the implement...
In my first article (GRUR Int. 2017, 301 and Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2017)...