In the process of proof alternative stories that explain 'what happened' in a case are tested using arguments based on evidence. Building on the author's earlier hybrid theory, this paper presents a formal theory that combines causal stories and evidential arguments, further integrating the different types of reasoning in a framework for structured argumentation. This then allows for correct reasoning with causal and evidential rules, and further integrates arguments and stories by grounding them both in well-known dialectical argumentation semantics
The subject of this thesis is reasoning with evidence to establish the facts in criminal cases. In a...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In the process of proof alternative stories that explain 'what happened' in a case are tested using ...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In this paper, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and bu...
In this article, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and ...
Abstract. This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generali-sations in a legal c...
This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We ...
This paper presents the hybrid theory of stories and arguments for reasoning with evidence in legal ...
In the literature on reasoning on the basis of evidence, two traditions exist: one argument-based, a...
The subject of this thesis is reasoning with evidence to establish the facts in criminal cases. In a...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In the process of proof alternative stories that explain 'what happened' in a case are tested using ...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In this paper, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and bu...
In this article, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and ...
Abstract. This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generali-sations in a legal c...
This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We ...
This paper presents the hybrid theory of stories and arguments for reasoning with evidence in legal ...
In the literature on reasoning on the basis of evidence, two traditions exist: one argument-based, a...
The subject of this thesis is reasoning with evidence to establish the facts in criminal cases. In a...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...