The dissertation provides an analysis and elaboration of Michael Dummett's proof-theoretic notions of validity. Dummett's notions of validity are contrasted with standard proof-theoretic notions and formally evaluated with respect to their adequacy to propositional intuitionistic logic
As far as logic is concerned, the conclusion of Michael Dummett's manifestability argument is that i...
In the tradition of Dummett-Prawitz-style proof-theoretic semantics, which considers validity of der...
This special issue collects together nine new essays on logical consequence :the relation ...
The dissertation provides an analysis and elaboration of Michael Dummett's proof-theoretic notions o...
Dummett’s justification procedures are revisited. They are used as background for the discussion of ...
This work is supported by Research Grant AH/F018398/1 (Foundations of Logical Consequence) from the ...
The model-theoretic analysis of the concept of logical consequence has come under heavy criticism in...
This dissertation is about logical consequence. The main points I will defend can be summarised as f...
What are people who disagree about logic disagreeing about? The paper argues that (in a wide range ...
Philosophers are divided on whether the proof- or truth-theoretic approach to logic is more fruitful...
Is it possible to give a justification of our own practice of deductive inference? The purpose of th...
CHAPTER ONE This thesis is a critical analysis of arguments which Michael Dummett has developed agai...
As far as logic is concerned, the conclusion of Michael Dummett's manifestability argument is that i...
In the tradition of Dummett-Prawitz-style proof-theoretic semantics, which considers validity of der...
This special issue collects together nine new essays on logical consequence :the relation ...
The dissertation provides an analysis and elaboration of Michael Dummett's proof-theoretic notions o...
Dummett’s justification procedures are revisited. They are used as background for the discussion of ...
This work is supported by Research Grant AH/F018398/1 (Foundations of Logical Consequence) from the ...
The model-theoretic analysis of the concept of logical consequence has come under heavy criticism in...
This dissertation is about logical consequence. The main points I will defend can be summarised as f...
What are people who disagree about logic disagreeing about? The paper argues that (in a wide range ...
Philosophers are divided on whether the proof- or truth-theoretic approach to logic is more fruitful...
Is it possible to give a justification of our own practice of deductive inference? The purpose of th...
CHAPTER ONE This thesis is a critical analysis of arguments which Michael Dummett has developed agai...
As far as logic is concerned, the conclusion of Michael Dummett's manifestability argument is that i...
In the tradition of Dummett-Prawitz-style proof-theoretic semantics, which considers validity of der...
This special issue collects together nine new essays on logical consequence :the relation ...
DOI
Add to ORKG