I argue that legitimacy discourses serve a gatekeeping function. They give practitioners telic standards for riding herd on social practices, ensuring that minimally acceptable versions of the practice are implemented. Such a function is a necessary part of implementing formalized social practices, especially including law. This gatekeeping account shows that political philosophers have misunderstood legitimacy; it is not secondary to justice and only necessary because we cannot agree about justice. Instead, it is a necessary feature of actual human social practices, which must be implemented via practitioners' discretion in changing contexts
This paper examines the differences between moralist, realist, and pragmatist approaches to politica...
Recent research has conceptualized legitimacy as a multi-level phenomenon comprising propriety and v...
By remaining epistemologically committed to an outdated distinction between facts and values, tradit...
I argue that legitimacy discourses serve a gatekeeping function. They give practitioners telic stand...
Theories of political legitimacy normally stipulate certain conditions of legitimacy: the features a...
The debate over rival conceptions of political legitimacy tends to focus on first-order consideratio...
In the recent debate on political legitimacy, we have seen the emergence of a revisionist camp, advo...
There is a moral presumption against the possession or exercise of coercive power, but political pow...
There is a moral presumption against the possession or exercise of coercive power, but political pow...
Consent plays a leading role in many theories of political legitimacy. Two approaches to theorizing ...
By remaining epistemologically committed to an outdated distinction between facts and values, tradit...
This essay contributes to developing a new approach to political legitimacy by asking what is involv...
Recent contributions in philosophy have shown that political realism, although refusing the elaborat...
This study develops a new philosophical approach to the concept of political legitimacy. It aims to ...
Legitimacy is a key concept in any effort both to theorize how governance works and to evaluate its ...
This paper examines the differences between moralist, realist, and pragmatist approaches to politica...
Recent research has conceptualized legitimacy as a multi-level phenomenon comprising propriety and v...
By remaining epistemologically committed to an outdated distinction between facts and values, tradit...
I argue that legitimacy discourses serve a gatekeeping function. They give practitioners telic stand...
Theories of political legitimacy normally stipulate certain conditions of legitimacy: the features a...
The debate over rival conceptions of political legitimacy tends to focus on first-order consideratio...
In the recent debate on political legitimacy, we have seen the emergence of a revisionist camp, advo...
There is a moral presumption against the possession or exercise of coercive power, but political pow...
There is a moral presumption against the possession or exercise of coercive power, but political pow...
Consent plays a leading role in many theories of political legitimacy. Two approaches to theorizing ...
By remaining epistemologically committed to an outdated distinction between facts and values, tradit...
This essay contributes to developing a new approach to political legitimacy by asking what is involv...
Recent contributions in philosophy have shown that political realism, although refusing the elaborat...
This study develops a new philosophical approach to the concept of political legitimacy. It aims to ...
Legitimacy is a key concept in any effort both to theorize how governance works and to evaluate its ...
This paper examines the differences between moralist, realist, and pragmatist approaches to politica...
Recent research has conceptualized legitimacy as a multi-level phenomenon comprising propriety and v...
By remaining epistemologically committed to an outdated distinction between facts and values, tradit...