On analyzing the problem that arises whenever the set of maximal elements is large, and a selection is then required (see Peris and Subiza, 1998), we realize that logical ways of selecting among maximals violate the classical notion and axioms of rationality. We arrive at the same conclusion if we analyze solutions to the problem of choosing from a tournament (where maximal elements do not necessarily exist). So, in our opinion the notion of rationality must be discussed, not only in the traditional sense of external conditions (Sen, 1993) but in terms of the internal information provided by the binary relation
Kalai, Rubinstein, and Spiegler (2002) propose the rationalization of choice functions that violate ...
This paper analyses the behavior of an individual who wants to maximize his utility function, but he...
I study necessary and sufficient conditions for a choice function to be rationalized in the followin...
In a choice situation, it is usually assumed that the agents select the maximal elements in accordan...
We examine the maximal-element rationalizability of choice functions with arbitrary domains. While r...
A choice function is a rule that chooses a single alternative from every set of alternatives drawn f...
We examine the maximal-element rationalizability of choice functions with arbitrary do-mains. While ...
Although the theory of greatest-element rationalizability and maximal-element rationalizability unde...
In this paper we characterize choice behaviour that picks the median element from a set of feasible ...
Financial support through grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada,...
Choice functions on tournaments always select the maximal element (Condorcet winner), provided they ...
Kalai, Rubinstein, and Spiegler (2002) propose the rationalization of choice functions that violate ...
In the literature related to choice theory an important problem which has been dealt at length is th...
Given a choice problem, the maximization rule may select many alternatives. In such cases, it is co...
In this paper we fully characterize an individual's choice behaviour according to three different so...
Kalai, Rubinstein, and Spiegler (2002) propose the rationalization of choice functions that violate ...
This paper analyses the behavior of an individual who wants to maximize his utility function, but he...
I study necessary and sufficient conditions for a choice function to be rationalized in the followin...
In a choice situation, it is usually assumed that the agents select the maximal elements in accordan...
We examine the maximal-element rationalizability of choice functions with arbitrary domains. While r...
A choice function is a rule that chooses a single alternative from every set of alternatives drawn f...
We examine the maximal-element rationalizability of choice functions with arbitrary do-mains. While ...
Although the theory of greatest-element rationalizability and maximal-element rationalizability unde...
In this paper we characterize choice behaviour that picks the median element from a set of feasible ...
Financial support through grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada,...
Choice functions on tournaments always select the maximal element (Condorcet winner), provided they ...
Kalai, Rubinstein, and Spiegler (2002) propose the rationalization of choice functions that violate ...
In the literature related to choice theory an important problem which has been dealt at length is th...
Given a choice problem, the maximization rule may select many alternatives. In such cases, it is co...
In this paper we fully characterize an individual's choice behaviour according to three different so...
Kalai, Rubinstein, and Spiegler (2002) propose the rationalization of choice functions that violate ...
This paper analyses the behavior of an individual who wants to maximize his utility function, but he...
I study necessary and sufficient conditions for a choice function to be rationalized in the followin...