The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal. 17(4). 1-23. This paper concerns itself with the syntax of the so-called right dislocated construction (RDC) in Korean. Taking the RDC as a crucial piece of evidence, J-S Lee (2007a,b, 2009) claims that Korean conforms to Kayne's (1994) universal word order (SVO) hypothesis. His claim sustains only when the RDC is analyzed as a mono-clause such that the post-verbal elements in the RDC belong to the propositional domain of the preceding predicate. Such a mono-clausal analysis hardly accounts for various properties that the RDC displays, including the fact that the RDC is a root phenomenon. The Korean RDC rather seems to be more readily accounted for by a bi-sentential analysis, as argued for the J...