Analisis efisiensi perbankan sebelum dan setelah krisis keuangan tahun 2008

Banking sector have important role in the process of development and growth as main indicator economic stability of the country, hence banks become industrial which was very regulated by government. Global financial crisis has given negative effects for economic growth especially banking. Performance measurement of banking efficiency is useful to quantify the growth of banking industries and also to overcome the problems of financial performance that occurred in banking industries. This study aims to measure the performance of banking efficiency and productivity before and after the global financial crisis. Through purposive sampling the sample obtained 88 conventional banks in Indonesia during the period of 2001 to 2016. The analysis that will be used to find out the efficiency of the bank was Data Envelopment Analyze (DEA) and the Malmquist Index will be used to determine bank productivity. This study concluded that banking Indonesia was inefficient in its intermediation function. The results showed that the perfomance efficiency score before crisis was 0.806 and score after crisis was 0.812 and there was no significant difference between efficiency performance before and after global crisis. The banks that were efficient are Bank Mandiri (Persero), Tbk; Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk and Bank Central Asia, Tbk have the highest asset. Banks with high asset have broad market forces and networks that are more efficient than banks with smaller asset. That indicates a strong impact of the total assets to the bank’s level of efficiency. Citibank NA and Standard Chartered Bank which wasnow known as foreign banks also efficient. The productivity of banks after crisis was increasing. Malmquist productivity banks was increasing during the period and the score is 1.002, indicated that technological change index was a major source of productivity. Technological change would force banks to be more efficient and productive