Was the Su[p]reme Court of Appeal correct in its judgement of the Stellenbosch Farmer's Winery case?

Includes bibliographical references.A contract requires two or more people to come to an agreement with regards to the requirements of such a contract with the intention of following the practice of whatever is set out in the contract, the main intention being to deliver a performance by both parties. When two parties sign a contract they are thus agreeing to stick to the terms of the contract that they are signing, as it becomes effective upon signature. The contract is then rendered to be in place and binding from that moment thereon. This implies that any condition that is not complied with in the contract that might take place after signing the contract will have penalty imputed on the guilty party as per stipulated in the contract. The contract must also provide the detailed measures that will be taken in the case of either party failing to honour the necessary conditions that were stated at the inception of the contract. Failure to adhere to the conditions in the contract is called breaching the terms of the contract and thus the company found guilty of breaching the contract will be liable to pay the penalties agreed to by the parties that have entered into that contract. If a company or individual signs a contract that will provide that particular company or individual with benefits for a certain period, but for whatever reasons the contract gets cancelled, it makes sense that the company or individual should receive compensation for the damages of the loss of the income that it would have received had the contract run its full course as intended without any party repudiating the specific contract in question. This brings me to the concept of damages and compensation