In the most recent assessments (Rademeyer and Butterworth, 2006) of the South African hake resource, Merluccius paradoxus and M. capensis are treated as two separate stocks, but are assessed simultaneously within a single assessment framework and for the south and west coasts combined. This simultaneous assessment is necessary because much of the data is available in species-aggregated form only. Thus the model is one of two species and two spatial strata (see Fig. 1) with differences in the distributions by age within each stratum handled by allowing for stratum-specific commercial (in principle, though not in this particular implementation) and survey selectivities, rather than explicitly modelling movement. This follows the recommendati...
This paper summarises the assumptions that have been made in previous hake assessments concerning th...
OLRAC (2009) notes the importance of the assumption for the pre-1978 species split of the offshore ...
Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus are morphologically very similar and cannot be registered separ...
This document presents a first attempt at a spatially structured model for the South African hake (t...
The distribution area for the South African hake population is separated into nine regions to accom...
The commercially valuable hake fishery off South Africa consists of two morphologically similar spec...
This paper presents a routine update of the South African hake assessment, including new commercial ...
Results are presented for a proposed new baseline assessment for the South African hake resource, in...
Results are presented for a series of sensitivities to the new baseline assessment (NBA) for the Sou...
The Reference Case assessment of the SA hake resource is updated using unchanged methodology from t...
The commercially valuable hake fishery off South Africa consists of two morphologically similar spec...
The 2008 “New Baseline” assessment for hake is updated to take account of further information that h...
The relatively high extent of depletion estimated for the M. paradoxus population is found to be rob...
This paper presents a routine update of the South African hake Reference Case assessment (RS1) (Rade...
The work aims to build on that done by Punt and Leslie (1995) in the development of a multispecies m...
This paper summarises the assumptions that have been made in previous hake assessments concerning th...
OLRAC (2009) notes the importance of the assumption for the pre-1978 species split of the offshore ...
Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus are morphologically very similar and cannot be registered separ...
This document presents a first attempt at a spatially structured model for the South African hake (t...
The distribution area for the South African hake population is separated into nine regions to accom...
The commercially valuable hake fishery off South Africa consists of two morphologically similar spec...
This paper presents a routine update of the South African hake assessment, including new commercial ...
Results are presented for a proposed new baseline assessment for the South African hake resource, in...
Results are presented for a series of sensitivities to the new baseline assessment (NBA) for the Sou...
The Reference Case assessment of the SA hake resource is updated using unchanged methodology from t...
The commercially valuable hake fishery off South Africa consists of two morphologically similar spec...
The 2008 “New Baseline” assessment for hake is updated to take account of further information that h...
The relatively high extent of depletion estimated for the M. paradoxus population is found to be rob...
This paper presents a routine update of the South African hake Reference Case assessment (RS1) (Rade...
The work aims to build on that done by Punt and Leslie (1995) in the development of a multispecies m...
This paper summarises the assumptions that have been made in previous hake assessments concerning th...
OLRAC (2009) notes the importance of the assumption for the pre-1978 species split of the offshore ...
Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus are morphologically very similar and cannot be registered separ...