In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on ‘consensusing’ and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation ...
The article gives an account of the first Austrian nationwide Danish-style consensus ...
This editorial introduction presents an overview of the themes explored in the symposium on Delibera...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2020I argue that there is no single, monolithic conception...
ABSTRACT In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Eur...
Different types of organizations, e.g. National Institute of Health (NIH), Intergovernmental Panel o...
We consider here how democracy cannot be reduced to consensus and majorityvoting without taking in c...
Different types of organizations, e.g. National Institute of Health (NIH), Intergovernmental Panel o...
In this article, we inquire into two contemporary participatory formats that seek to democratically ...
This paper reviews current debates in social epistemology about the relations between knowledge a...
peer reviewedIn this short reply to Alan Irwin, we zoom in on the three main issues he raises: 1. Ho...
The consensus conference is a participatory mechanism that envisages ordinary citizens engaging with...
In this chapter, we shed new light on the epistemic struggle between establishing consensus and ackn...
This paper is a rejoinder to Alan Irwin's constructive response "Agreeing to Differ?" to our (2017) ...
In this paper, I inquire into two public deliberative formats that aim to render scientific and tech...
Consensus and disagreement play important roles in the practice, development, and dissemination of s...
The article gives an account of the first Austrian nationwide Danish-style consensus ...
This editorial introduction presents an overview of the themes explored in the symposium on Delibera...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2020I argue that there is no single, monolithic conception...
ABSTRACT In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Eur...
Different types of organizations, e.g. National Institute of Health (NIH), Intergovernmental Panel o...
We consider here how democracy cannot be reduced to consensus and majorityvoting without taking in c...
Different types of organizations, e.g. National Institute of Health (NIH), Intergovernmental Panel o...
In this article, we inquire into two contemporary participatory formats that seek to democratically ...
This paper reviews current debates in social epistemology about the relations between knowledge a...
peer reviewedIn this short reply to Alan Irwin, we zoom in on the three main issues he raises: 1. Ho...
The consensus conference is a participatory mechanism that envisages ordinary citizens engaging with...
In this chapter, we shed new light on the epistemic struggle between establishing consensus and ackn...
This paper is a rejoinder to Alan Irwin's constructive response "Agreeing to Differ?" to our (2017) ...
In this paper, I inquire into two public deliberative formats that aim to render scientific and tech...
Consensus and disagreement play important roles in the practice, development, and dissemination of s...
The article gives an account of the first Austrian nationwide Danish-style consensus ...
This editorial introduction presents an overview of the themes explored in the symposium on Delibera...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2020I argue that there is no single, monolithic conception...