Review of \u3ci\u3eCoyote Kills John Wayne: Postmodernism and Contemporary Fictions of the Transcultural Frontier\u3c/i\u3e By Carlton Smith

Delivered at the World\u27s Columbian Exposition in 1893, Frederick Jackson Turner\u27s now-famous frontier thesis speech, The Significance of the Frontier in American History, contends with only one other nineteenth- century development in terms of popularity and influence: Buffalo Bill\u27s Wild West Show. These narratives provided complementary visions of Western history that centered on white males, marginalizing women and people of color. Together they shaped both academic and popular perceptions for most of the twentieth century . It is this racialized and gendered vision of the West that Carlton Smith takes as the starting point for Coyote Kills John Wayne. Contemporary Western fiction, Smith contends, challenges the masculinist foundations of conventional narratives and transforms the frontier into a transcultural borderland. Smith analyzes a range of texts and films that offer alternative visions of the frontier; these include William Vollman\u27s Arctic narratives, Sergio Leone\u27s Western films, Thomas McGuane\u27s fiction, as well as works by Native novelists Leslie Marmon Silko, Thomas King, and Louise Erdrich. The juxtaposition of these texts is one of the strengths of Coyote, offering vastly different conceptions of the West that resist the hegemonic impulses of conventional narratives. At the same time, this juxtaposition provides an opportunity to think of the West as the site of complicated, often violent interactions between cultures, a history suppressed or obfuscated in Turner\u27s speech and Buffalo Bill\u27s Wild West. In this respect, however, Coyote Kills John Wayne replicates rather than challenges the cultural work of these narratives. Smith\u27s primary concern is with the ways in which contemporary Western texts perform postmodernism by providing inquiries into the constructedness of identity and the role of semiotics in creating discursive formations. These disruptive strategies, Smith contends, undermine fixed identities, imperial narratives and even the frontier itself. Smith\u27s analyses of Western texts demonstrate how they bear out the theories of Homi Bhabha, Frederic Jameson, Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, and others. This use of postmodern theory elides differences between texts with fundamentally divergent concerns. In Smith\u27s analysis, for example, Silko\u27s Almanac of the Dead and Leone\u27s The Good, the Bad and the Ugly absurdly perform essentially the same cultural work, although Silko\u27s novel examines the devastating colonial history of the Americas while Leone\u27s film is primarily concerned with Western filmic conventions. This approach results in serious misreadings of both primary and secondary sources by reducing texts deeply concerned with colonial dominance, political resistance, and complex cultural relations to forms of semiotic appropriation that ultimately bear little relation to the historical contexts that shape them