Review of \u3ci\u3eLarry McMurtry and the West: An Ambivalent Relationship\u3c/i\u3e By Mark Busby

In this thorough look at McMurtry\u27s canon through 1995, Mark Busby asserts that the novelist deliberately escaped from his southwestern roots and Texas\u27s mythic past, then made a spiritual and triumphant return to them. But Busby insists that the novelist\u27s return to western themes and stories represents not a coming home but rather a continuing ambivalence that is worked out to some degree in every work he has completed, regardless of setting. Beginning with McMurtry\u27s youth in Archer City, Busby explores McMurtry\u27s attempts to break out of the minor regional novelist mold. Busby begins with McMurtry\u27s earliest writings, then searches for consistencies throughout the writer\u27s published works, seeking to establish parallels between McMurtry\u27s personal philosophy and his writings. In the past McMurtry has, in effect, disowned his earliest novels, particularly Horseman, Pass By, which he has called juvenile pratings. But what becomes apparent in Busby\u27s reading of the full body of McMurtry\u27s work is that the novelist continually returns to the same archetypes, each time enlarging and expanding them, pushing them sometimes to absurd or comic limits in order to define his version of the Texas heroic myth. Busby asserts that each of these manifestations represents a maturation of the novelist\u27s vision. In that sense, Busby points out, McMurtry is attempting in his prose to rediscover both his own past and that of his region. He recreates legends and mythic stories, not to make them grand or memorable, but to pare them down to size, to humanize them through hyperbole and farce, thus better to reveal the truth, if there is one, about the region\u27s mythic value. The result is an ambivalent relationship between writer and region, something that lacks a clear focus or thesis. But for the critic, Busby notes, the problem is to determine whether the result is genuinely literary. Wisely, Busby does not answer that question, at least not entirely. Rather, he presents a series of cogent and well written analyses of ideas, themes, and internal analogues, tracing the development of such elements throughout McMurtry\u27s canon. Busby argues that such connections as he defines between character and event are obvious. His evidence is often biographical rather than critical, yet his argument is persuasive if not entirely convincing. A major plus in Busby\u27s book is that he allows McMurtry and his critics to speak for themselves. Stepping into the background, he draws on what\u27s been said by McMurtry and his critics to present a telling argument for McMurtry\u27s significance as a major regional novelist. His conclusion is that the Archer City writer may be as close as Texas will ever come to producing a significant literary figure who actually writes about his own region