Nationally, universities and colleges are expressing increased interest in peer review of teaching in response to public calls for accountability from academe. Further motivation comes from within campuses themselves as they respond to an increasingly non-traditional student body. Based on our experience with a peer observation program at California State University-Dominguez Hills, we identified twelve steps for planning and implementing a peer review process. In this article we discuss each of the twelve steps, presenting a rationale and sharing our experiences
The national impact of UNL’s Peer Review of Teaching Project was recognized in 2005 – with a TIAA-CR...
Attempts to establish a rationale for formative evaluation and peer review for instructional improve...
The term “peer review” often elicits a negative response from teachers and students alike. The proce...
The effectiveness of teaching is expected by an increasingly skeptical public that wants those in hi...
Peer review of teaching can help departments improve their treatment of teaching as disciplinary sch...
2 p.A microfiche copy of this title is available through the UO Libraries under the call number: DOC...
This new edition is substantially revised and updated, with ten completely new chapters. It includes...
This project aimed to encourage and support greater participation in peer review of teaching through...
One of the challenges of 21st-century academia is meeting the often-competing demands from students,...
The Peer Review of Teaching Project (PRTP) is a UNL campus program that supports teams of faculty in...
Instructors of writing courses have used peer review in their classes for many years, but there is c...
Summative peer review of teaching has the ability to improve both the status and the quality of teac...
Peer assistance and review (PAR) programs are prominent and controversial mechanism within the educa...
Peer review of teaching is recognized increasingly as one strategy for academic development even tho...
Quality education and teacher accountability are predominant issues generating apprehension in highe...
The national impact of UNL’s Peer Review of Teaching Project was recognized in 2005 – with a TIAA-CR...
Attempts to establish a rationale for formative evaluation and peer review for instructional improve...
The term “peer review” often elicits a negative response from teachers and students alike. The proce...
The effectiveness of teaching is expected by an increasingly skeptical public that wants those in hi...
Peer review of teaching can help departments improve their treatment of teaching as disciplinary sch...
2 p.A microfiche copy of this title is available through the UO Libraries under the call number: DOC...
This new edition is substantially revised and updated, with ten completely new chapters. It includes...
This project aimed to encourage and support greater participation in peer review of teaching through...
One of the challenges of 21st-century academia is meeting the often-competing demands from students,...
The Peer Review of Teaching Project (PRTP) is a UNL campus program that supports teams of faculty in...
Instructors of writing courses have used peer review in their classes for many years, but there is c...
Summative peer review of teaching has the ability to improve both the status and the quality of teac...
Peer assistance and review (PAR) programs are prominent and controversial mechanism within the educa...
Peer review of teaching is recognized increasingly as one strategy for academic development even tho...
Quality education and teacher accountability are predominant issues generating apprehension in highe...
The national impact of UNL’s Peer Review of Teaching Project was recognized in 2005 – with a TIAA-CR...
Attempts to establish a rationale for formative evaluation and peer review for instructional improve...
The term “peer review” often elicits a negative response from teachers and students alike. The proce...