In a dissertation submitted to the Department of Rhetoric and Oratory at the University of Wisconsin in 1895, Zona Gale argued that American writers were a timid lot, lacking originality and unwilling or unable to see what was happening around them, the harsher truths of a social reality. They drew their material from art rather than from nature, books rather than life. They had, she said, all drawn from the same sources, imitated the same models and had not won their material so much from men as from books. 1 Like Zona Gale, Willa Cather was critical of writers content to work within the boundaries of established narrative patterns and formations. She likened the old-fashioned American novel to a chemist\u27s prescription with its u...