Add to ORKGLabeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approval of the 2002 farm bill. The passage of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act in May, 2002 did create country of origin labeling (COOL); however, the controversy over COOL did not end there. In fact, it has intensified amongst producers, processors and retailers as they struggle to determine how to comply with COOL and exactly how it affects their operations
H.R. 2744, USDA’s FY2006 appropriation, again postpones rules requiring many retailers to provide co...
Proponents of the U.S. mandatory country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL) law have argued that consumers p...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
Labeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approva...
Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) w...
The ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being pa...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
The Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill require, beginning September ...
Public Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-or...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
Although several studies have estimated the costs of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), no previous ...
Since 1949, the Farm Bill has been updated every four to six years to reflect the evolving needs of ...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...
This revision is dated May 23, 2003.The 2002 Farm Bill contained a controversial provision mandating...
Country of origin labelling (COOL) on food products is controversial. There is disagreement over whe...
H.R. 2744, USDA’s FY2006 appropriation, again postpones rules requiring many retailers to provide co...
Proponents of the U.S. mandatory country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL) law have argued that consumers p...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...
Labeling meat and other perishable agricultural products was vigorously debated prior to the approva...
Another step in the multi-year development and implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) w...
The ongoing debate over mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) continues, despite COOL being pa...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
The Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) provisions in the 2002 Farm Bill require, beginning September ...
Public Law 107-171 of the U.S. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 required country-of-or...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
Although several studies have estimated the costs of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), no previous ...
Since 1949, the Farm Bill has been updated every four to six years to reflect the evolving needs of ...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...
This revision is dated May 23, 2003.The 2002 Farm Bill contained a controversial provision mandating...
Country of origin labelling (COOL) on food products is controversial. There is disagreement over whe...
H.R. 2744, USDA’s FY2006 appropriation, again postpones rules requiring many retailers to provide co...
Proponents of the U.S. mandatory country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL) law have argued that consumers p...
When President Bush signed the Farm Bill on May 13, 2002, much of the focus was on the new commodity...