Investigated specificity in reading disability by comparing 2 approaches to defining and selecting children with reading disabilities. One approach defined reading disability according to cutoff scores representing appropriate levels of intelligence and reading deficiency, whereas the other approach adjusted these scores for their intercorrelation through regression procedures. Results reveal differences in which of 1,069 children (aged 9-14 yrs) were identified as reading disabled, depending on the definition used. However, differences in neuropsychological performance between Ss whose reading scores were discrepant or not discrepant with their IQ scores were small and nonspecific for both definitions
Abstract. This study was conducted to determine whether the cognitive performance of reading disable...
In this article, reading disability is defined broadly to refer to below-average achievement in read...
A heterogeneous group of learning disabled children and a relatively homogeneous group having specif...
Investigated specificity in reading disability by comparing 2 approaches to defining and selecting c...
Consequences of the variations in the type of criteria used to define reading disability were examin...
We used data derived from a survey sample, the Connecticut Longitudinal Study (CLS), to compare two ...
grantor: University of TorontoThis study addresses the validity of distinguishing whether...
According to federal regulations, children with reading difficulties are eligi-ble for special educa...
This article synthesizes some of the published literature that selectively compares the cogni-tive f...
The relevance oflQ to the definition of learning disabilities is a much-debated issue. In this artic...
There has been considerable discussion of the methods used for the identification of children with r...
grantor: University of TorontoThis study examined reading development in low birth weight ...
The purpose of this study was to test the role of visual processing speed and IQ in a model of readi...
In this article we discuss research bearing on the traditional use of the IQ-achievement discrepancy...
An emerging concern has been the lack of a replicable definition of learning disabilities. One way i...
Abstract. This study was conducted to determine whether the cognitive performance of reading disable...
In this article, reading disability is defined broadly to refer to below-average achievement in read...
A heterogeneous group of learning disabled children and a relatively homogeneous group having specif...
Investigated specificity in reading disability by comparing 2 approaches to defining and selecting c...
Consequences of the variations in the type of criteria used to define reading disability were examin...
We used data derived from a survey sample, the Connecticut Longitudinal Study (CLS), to compare two ...
grantor: University of TorontoThis study addresses the validity of distinguishing whether...
According to federal regulations, children with reading difficulties are eligi-ble for special educa...
This article synthesizes some of the published literature that selectively compares the cogni-tive f...
The relevance oflQ to the definition of learning disabilities is a much-debated issue. In this artic...
There has been considerable discussion of the methods used for the identification of children with r...
grantor: University of TorontoThis study examined reading development in low birth weight ...
The purpose of this study was to test the role of visual processing speed and IQ in a model of readi...
In this article we discuss research bearing on the traditional use of the IQ-achievement discrepancy...
An emerging concern has been the lack of a replicable definition of learning disabilities. One way i...
Abstract. This study was conducted to determine whether the cognitive performance of reading disable...
In this article, reading disability is defined broadly to refer to below-average achievement in read...
A heterogeneous group of learning disabled children and a relatively homogeneous group having specif...