Why do some national leaders pursue ambitious grand strategies and adventuresome foreign policies while others do not? When do leaders boldly confront foreign threats and when are they less assertive? Politics and Strategy shows that grand strategies are Janus-faced: their formulation has as much to do with a leader's ability to govern at home as it does with maintaining the nation's security abroad. Drawing on the American political experience, Peter Trubowitz reveals how variations in domestic party politics and international power have led presidents from George Washington to Barack Obama to pursue strategies that differ widely in international ambition and cost. He considers why some presidents overreach in foreign affairs while others ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from MIT Press via the DOI in...
States pursue different grand strategies at different times with different degrees of success. Why? ...
The traditional model of agenda setting places the Presidency as the primary agenda setter in Americ...
From Clinton to Bush to Obama to Trump: the personalities, rhetoric, and policies of Presidents char...
Abstract The strategic structure of USA in terms of foreign policy was primarily motivated by the p...
Throughout their time in office, American presidents are often forced to choose between leading the ...
America’s crystal ball on strategy is murky. Officials in the next administration will face a comple...
While each of the dominant theories of International Relations offers segmented contributions to con...
How do leaders navigate foreign policy making when their preferences are at odds with their publics?...
While domestic issues loom large in voters? minds during American presidential elections, matters of...
A revisionary account of the challenges posed to America’s global primacy by competing visions of gr...
Many voices challenge the values and norms of the international order. If the United States seeks to...
Many voices challenge the values and norms of the international order. If the United States seeks to...
abstract: This thesis seeks to answer as to how leaders implement grand strategy. The framework for ...
Presidential-congressional relations scholars have long debated whether the president is more succes...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from MIT Press via the DOI in...
States pursue different grand strategies at different times with different degrees of success. Why? ...
The traditional model of agenda setting places the Presidency as the primary agenda setter in Americ...
From Clinton to Bush to Obama to Trump: the personalities, rhetoric, and policies of Presidents char...
Abstract The strategic structure of USA in terms of foreign policy was primarily motivated by the p...
Throughout their time in office, American presidents are often forced to choose between leading the ...
America’s crystal ball on strategy is murky. Officials in the next administration will face a comple...
While each of the dominant theories of International Relations offers segmented contributions to con...
How do leaders navigate foreign policy making when their preferences are at odds with their publics?...
While domestic issues loom large in voters? minds during American presidential elections, matters of...
A revisionary account of the challenges posed to America’s global primacy by competing visions of gr...
Many voices challenge the values and norms of the international order. If the United States seeks to...
Many voices challenge the values and norms of the international order. If the United States seeks to...
abstract: This thesis seeks to answer as to how leaders implement grand strategy. The framework for ...
Presidential-congressional relations scholars have long debated whether the president is more succes...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from MIT Press via the DOI in...
States pursue different grand strategies at different times with different degrees of success. Why? ...
The traditional model of agenda setting places the Presidency as the primary agenda setter in Americ...