Civil Justive in the global current society (traducido al japonés)

The ideological parameters that inspire the society of the 21st century have destroyed some of the old values of the twentieth century, especially those that erected Justice as one of the pillars of the social and democratic state. The Justice that interest us is one that works, certainly, but in terms of the analysis of what must be understood by the functioning of Justice have shed numerous components that, beyond the essential meaning of Justice as a guardianship of citizens, has been turned into mechanisms to alleviate the expansive litigiousness that society generates in some cases, and palliate it in the swiftest and least costly way possible, even at the expense of guarantees and rights. In that context the sublime is the economy, and everything is measured under cost-benefit parameters; The process is not an instrument of justice, probably because justice is not more than one of the values of the legal order, the standard of modern society, and it is becoming a service for consumers and users, who look for a result, although it would not be the best result, but in any case a result. The great transformations of the 21st Century have been provoked by Globalization. A global and globalized society emerges, in which the local and the global is merged, generating a sort of legal glocalization, which clearly has been seen in the process. The paradigmatic model of justice is subjected to pressure, and is not able to fulfill the expectations generated by the parties as a system to ensure full compliance with the right to access justice. This position is reflected to one degree or another in many countries of the world, and in that unstoppable and feverish legislative activity that tries to adapt an 'analogical' and static Justice to a 'digital', flexible one with real time Access. Because of this reason, a worldwide proliferation of rules and regulations is accruing without control