In his recent book, Killing in War, Jeff McMahan sets out a number of conditions for a person to be liable to attack, provided the attack is used to avert an objectively unjust threat: (1) The threat, if realized, will wrongfully harm another; (2) the person is responsible for creating the threat; (3) killing the person is necessary to avert the threat, and (4) killing the person is a proportionate response to the threat. The present article focuses on McMahan's second condition, which links liability with responsibility. McMahan's use of the responsibility criterion, the article contends, is too restrictive as an account of liability in general and an account of liability to be killed in particular. In order to defend this claim, the artic...
Book review of Jeff McMahan, Killing in war. UK: Oxford Unuversity Press, 2009. ISBN 9780199548668.p...
Despite worries about paternalism, when we are unjustifiably attacked, we are morally warranted, and...
This paper considers whether victims can justify what appears to be unnecessary defensive harming by...
This paper deals with the conditions of liability to self-defense. When I use the term liability, I ...
Jeff McMahan has argued against the moral equivalence of combatants (MEC) by developing a liability-...
In a recent paper, McMahan argues that his ‘Responsibility Account’, according to which ‘the criteri...
Who is morally liable to be killed in war? The individualist view of liability has been a familiar j...
To say that a person is morally liable to some harm implies that he would not be wronged by sufferin...
This doctoral thesis addresses questions in contemporary just war theory about the relationship betw...
Even among those who find lethal defense against non-responsible threats, innocent aggressors, or ju...
First published online: 13 June 2019An influential view in the ethics of self‐defence is that causal...
In this article, I press a line of objection to Jonathan Quong's moral status account of liability t...
In her inventive and tightly argued book Defensive Killing, Helen Frowe defends the view that bystan...
The focus of this paper is an influential family of views in the ethics of self-defense and war: vie...
The work of Jeff McMahan has revitalised discussion of just war theory with its rejection of the mor...
Book review of Jeff McMahan, Killing in war. UK: Oxford Unuversity Press, 2009. ISBN 9780199548668.p...
Despite worries about paternalism, when we are unjustifiably attacked, we are morally warranted, and...
This paper considers whether victims can justify what appears to be unnecessary defensive harming by...
This paper deals with the conditions of liability to self-defense. When I use the term liability, I ...
Jeff McMahan has argued against the moral equivalence of combatants (MEC) by developing a liability-...
In a recent paper, McMahan argues that his ‘Responsibility Account’, according to which ‘the criteri...
Who is morally liable to be killed in war? The individualist view of liability has been a familiar j...
To say that a person is morally liable to some harm implies that he would not be wronged by sufferin...
This doctoral thesis addresses questions in contemporary just war theory about the relationship betw...
Even among those who find lethal defense against non-responsible threats, innocent aggressors, or ju...
First published online: 13 June 2019An influential view in the ethics of self‐defence is that causal...
In this article, I press a line of objection to Jonathan Quong's moral status account of liability t...
In her inventive and tightly argued book Defensive Killing, Helen Frowe defends the view that bystan...
The focus of this paper is an influential family of views in the ethics of self-defense and war: vie...
The work of Jeff McMahan has revitalised discussion of just war theory with its rejection of the mor...
Book review of Jeff McMahan, Killing in war. UK: Oxford Unuversity Press, 2009. ISBN 9780199548668.p...
Despite worries about paternalism, when we are unjustifiably attacked, we are morally warranted, and...
This paper considers whether victims can justify what appears to be unnecessary defensive harming by...