In Issue 5, 2010 of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Injuries Group (CIG) published its 100th systematic review. Such a milestone provides a good opportunity to reflect on the ways in which the Group's output may have influenced clinical practice, healthcare policy, and research since its inception in 1997.Peer reviewedFinal Accepted Versio
Cochrane systematic reviews have proven to be beneficial for decision making processes, both on a pr...
Background: Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date is chall...
Objective: To assess how information about adverse events is included in systematic reviews. Study D...
Background: The last few decades have seen a growing emphasis on evidence-informed decision-making i...
International audience: This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has p...
This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has played a pivotal role in ...
© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2015. This work was produced by Bunn et al. under the terms...
Importance: Burden of disease should impact research prioritisation. Objective: To analyse the Cochr...
Burden of disease should impact research prioritisation.To analyse the Cochrane Database of Systemat...
Objectives: To examine the research translation phase focus (T1-T4) of systematic reviews published ...
AbstractImportanceBurden of disease should impact research prioritisation.ObjectiveTo analyse the Co...
In the current information age, research synthesis is a particularly useful tool for keeping track o...
International audience: The global evidence base for health care is extensive, and expanding; with n...
Compared with other study designs, well-done random-ized trials provide the most valid estimate of t...
Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers be...
Cochrane systematic reviews have proven to be beneficial for decision making processes, both on a pr...
Background: Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date is chall...
Objective: To assess how information about adverse events is included in systematic reviews. Study D...
Background: The last few decades have seen a growing emphasis on evidence-informed decision-making i...
International audience: This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has p...
This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has played a pivotal role in ...
© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2015. This work was produced by Bunn et al. under the terms...
Importance: Burden of disease should impact research prioritisation. Objective: To analyse the Cochr...
Burden of disease should impact research prioritisation.To analyse the Cochrane Database of Systemat...
Objectives: To examine the research translation phase focus (T1-T4) of systematic reviews published ...
AbstractImportanceBurden of disease should impact research prioritisation.ObjectiveTo analyse the Co...
In the current information age, research synthesis is a particularly useful tool for keeping track o...
International audience: The global evidence base for health care is extensive, and expanding; with n...
Compared with other study designs, well-done random-ized trials provide the most valid estimate of t...
Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers be...
Cochrane systematic reviews have proven to be beneficial for decision making processes, both on a pr...
Background: Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date is chall...
Objective: To assess how information about adverse events is included in systematic reviews. Study D...