International law-making is no longer a process dominated by states alone. Especially in the formation of customary international law (CIL) the practice of non-state entities - especially of international organizations - has become influential and calls for reconceptualization on the nature of CIL
Contemporary international lawmaking is characterized by a rapid growth of “soft law” instruments. I...
Sovereign States are under a legal obligation to comply with customary international law even though...
The way that actors create, implement, and control international law is far more complex today than ...
The formation of customary international law (CIL) remains controversial attracting a plethora of li...
This collection of essays provides the most comprehensive study of the theory and practice on the co...
In the Westphalian State, Customary International Law (CIL) has traditionally been informed by high-...
Traditionally, the only recognized subjects of public international law have been states and intergo...
Traditionally, the actors in the international legal sys-tem are divided into States and non-state a...
States have captured the imagination of international legal scholars, to the extent that for a varie...
The current state of international law is one of deep confusion over the role of state practice and ...
This article demonstrates how the core assumption of the dominant international legal doctrine that ...
The current state of international law is one of deep confusion over the role of state practice and ...
After an empirical appraisal of the extent to which non-state actors wield some law-making powers at...
With the emergence of powerful non-state actors onto the international plane, it has been necessary ...
With the emergence of powerful non-state actors onto the international plane, it has been necessary ...
Contemporary international lawmaking is characterized by a rapid growth of “soft law” instruments. I...
Sovereign States are under a legal obligation to comply with customary international law even though...
The way that actors create, implement, and control international law is far more complex today than ...
The formation of customary international law (CIL) remains controversial attracting a plethora of li...
This collection of essays provides the most comprehensive study of the theory and practice on the co...
In the Westphalian State, Customary International Law (CIL) has traditionally been informed by high-...
Traditionally, the only recognized subjects of public international law have been states and intergo...
Traditionally, the actors in the international legal sys-tem are divided into States and non-state a...
States have captured the imagination of international legal scholars, to the extent that for a varie...
The current state of international law is one of deep confusion over the role of state practice and ...
This article demonstrates how the core assumption of the dominant international legal doctrine that ...
The current state of international law is one of deep confusion over the role of state practice and ...
After an empirical appraisal of the extent to which non-state actors wield some law-making powers at...
With the emergence of powerful non-state actors onto the international plane, it has been necessary ...
With the emergence of powerful non-state actors onto the international plane, it has been necessary ...
Contemporary international lawmaking is characterized by a rapid growth of “soft law” instruments. I...
Sovereign States are under a legal obligation to comply with customary international law even though...
The way that actors create, implement, and control international law is far more complex today than ...
DOI
Add to ORKG