Turn over a copy of David Enoch’s Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism, and you will find the usual array of quotations extolling the book’s virtues. The first is from Russ Shafer-Landau—arguably the philosopher most responsible for the current resurgence of Moorean-style non-naturalism—who writes that this “is the best book that has ever been written in defense of ethical realism.” The last is from Hartry Field, who claims that “on the scale of texts arguing for an obviously false conclusion, this actually ranks pretty high!
We here analyse the ethical dimensions of the UK's ‘Research Excellence Framework’ (REF), the latest...
Erik Wielenberg’s new book Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Real...
Professor Robinson provides a critique of M.J. Detmold’s book, The Unity of Law & Mortality: A Refut...
This collection contains essays from the Workshop on Moral Psychology and Human Agency at the Univer...
This volume covers two related debates in both meta-ethics and the philosophy of mathematics, with b...
This is a review of D. Enoch's book Taking Morality Seriously. A Defence of Robust Moral Realism
Taking Morality Seriously is David Enoch’s book-length defense of meta-ethical and meta-normative no...
This review article examines David Enoch’s recent book Taking Morality Seriously and focuses on ‘the...
David Enoch, in Taking Morality Seriously, argues for a broad normative asymmetry between how we sho...
Book review. The author incisively defends moral anti-realism. He advises that one should act only o...
[Excerpt] This new book by Simon Robertson reveals an impressive mastery of the subject. His previou...
Many people accept, at least implicitly, what I call the asymmetry claim: the view that moral realis...
Miller\u27s important book divides in two. The metaethical half argues that moral inquiry can provid...
Milbank and Pabst’s account of liberalism as rooted in ontological violence picks out the secret com...
William Irwin defends a form of moral anti-realism, according to which there are no objective moral ...
We here analyse the ethical dimensions of the UK's ‘Research Excellence Framework’ (REF), the latest...
Erik Wielenberg’s new book Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Real...
Professor Robinson provides a critique of M.J. Detmold’s book, The Unity of Law & Mortality: A Refut...
This collection contains essays from the Workshop on Moral Psychology and Human Agency at the Univer...
This volume covers two related debates in both meta-ethics and the philosophy of mathematics, with b...
This is a review of D. Enoch's book Taking Morality Seriously. A Defence of Robust Moral Realism
Taking Morality Seriously is David Enoch’s book-length defense of meta-ethical and meta-normative no...
This review article examines David Enoch’s recent book Taking Morality Seriously and focuses on ‘the...
David Enoch, in Taking Morality Seriously, argues for a broad normative asymmetry between how we sho...
Book review. The author incisively defends moral anti-realism. He advises that one should act only o...
[Excerpt] This new book by Simon Robertson reveals an impressive mastery of the subject. His previou...
Many people accept, at least implicitly, what I call the asymmetry claim: the view that moral realis...
Miller\u27s important book divides in two. The metaethical half argues that moral inquiry can provid...
Milbank and Pabst’s account of liberalism as rooted in ontological violence picks out the secret com...
William Irwin defends a form of moral anti-realism, according to which there are no objective moral ...
We here analyse the ethical dimensions of the UK's ‘Research Excellence Framework’ (REF), the latest...
Erik Wielenberg’s new book Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Real...
Professor Robinson provides a critique of M.J. Detmold’s book, The Unity of Law & Mortality: A Refut...