An appropriate basis for denying the recovery of damages in tort on the ground that the plaintiff has been guilty of illegal wrongdoing has for long been a matter of debate in the common law courts. We can find a number of different justifications in the cases, with significant contributions being made by the House of Lords and the UK Supreme Court, the High Court of Australia, and the Supreme Court of Canada. The article examines the various arguments, makes suggestions as to what is helpful and what is not, and concludes by identifying the key questions to ask in any case where the illegality issue is raised
This article argues that there is nothing overly confusing about the law ofcausation in negligence. ...
Tort law provides for a large number of defences to liability. While the circumstances in which some...
Not long ago, American tort law clearly rejected an "outlaw" doctrine: a plaintiff engaged in tortio...
Reform of the illegality defence in tort law was proposed by the Law Commission (England and Wales) ...
An appropriate basis for denying the recovery of damages in tort on the ground that the plaintiff ha...
The maxim ex turpi causa non oritur actio (an action does not arise from a base cause) is premised o...
The doctrine of illegality referred to as ex turpi causa non oritur actio provides a defence to civi...
AbstractThe illegality defence is an important element of private law, but its operation has been un...
Discusses, with reference to case law, the principles used to prevent the acquisition of property ri...
In 1991, the High Court delivered judgment in Gala v Preston. This landmark case concerned the defen...
The doctrine of illegality is now in vogue as an answer to liability in tort. It is also very regula...
The Supreme Court recently handed down judgment in the appeal in Patel v Mirza [2016]. In this landm...
The issue of causation is fundamental to every constitutional tort action. Money damages are not rec...
The suggestion that persons convicted of criminal offences could obtain compensation or indemnity in...
This Article considers whether denial of a cause of action for educational malpractice is consistent...
This article argues that there is nothing overly confusing about the law ofcausation in negligence. ...
Tort law provides for a large number of defences to liability. While the circumstances in which some...
Not long ago, American tort law clearly rejected an "outlaw" doctrine: a plaintiff engaged in tortio...
Reform of the illegality defence in tort law was proposed by the Law Commission (England and Wales) ...
An appropriate basis for denying the recovery of damages in tort on the ground that the plaintiff ha...
The maxim ex turpi causa non oritur actio (an action does not arise from a base cause) is premised o...
The doctrine of illegality referred to as ex turpi causa non oritur actio provides a defence to civi...
AbstractThe illegality defence is an important element of private law, but its operation has been un...
Discusses, with reference to case law, the principles used to prevent the acquisition of property ri...
In 1991, the High Court delivered judgment in Gala v Preston. This landmark case concerned the defen...
The doctrine of illegality is now in vogue as an answer to liability in tort. It is also very regula...
The Supreme Court recently handed down judgment in the appeal in Patel v Mirza [2016]. In this landm...
The issue of causation is fundamental to every constitutional tort action. Money damages are not rec...
The suggestion that persons convicted of criminal offences could obtain compensation or indemnity in...
This Article considers whether denial of a cause of action for educational malpractice is consistent...
This article argues that there is nothing overly confusing about the law ofcausation in negligence. ...
Tort law provides for a large number of defences to liability. While the circumstances in which some...
Not long ago, American tort law clearly rejected an "outlaw" doctrine: a plaintiff engaged in tortio...