To understand human evolution, archaeologists require precise chronologies to compare and contrast the fossil collection. While indirect dating techniques of human occupation sites usually applied on sediments are somehow more precise than direct dating techniques, the accuracy of indirect dating is frequently poor. Direct dating of human remains older than 50 to 60 ka (radiocarbon limit) is limited to U-series and ESR techniques. To minimize the impact of direct dating on valuable archaeological samples, non-destructive U-series and ESR analysis have to be carried out using specifically designed protocols. Both methods are seriously compromised by the fact that teeth accumulate large amounts of uranium following their deposition in sedimen...
Fossil bones and teeth usually are very common archeological findings. At many sites these remains, ...
Unlike radiometric methods based on the measurement of radioactive growth or decay of isotopes (e.g....
International audiencePalaeolithic sites associated to the Eemian Interglacial (MIS 5e) are very rar...
This paper reviews the possible approaches for dating of human bones and teeth, older than 500,000. ...
We have mapped U (238U) and Th (232Th) elemental concentrations as well as U-series isotope distribu...
Teeth are usually targeted for dating archaeological sites because they are less prone to dissolutio...
U and Th concentration profiles in fossil hominid and faunal teeth have been measured by laser ablat...
Post-deposition U uptake by bones and teeth is the most significant source of inaccuracy in both U-s...
We have mapped U (238U) and Th (232Th) elemental concentrations as well as U-series isotope distribu...
Over the past two decades, the combined electron spin resonance (ESR) and U-series dating method has...
Quite often ESR dating of tooth enamel provides underestimated ages. The factors, which may account ...
Two fragments of a hominin tooth (Australopithecus robustus) and two bovid teeth from the Hanging Re...
Fossil bones and teeth usually are very common archeological findings. At many sites these remains, ...
Unlike radiometric methods based on the measurement of radioactive growth or decay of isotopes (e.g....
International audiencePalaeolithic sites associated to the Eemian Interglacial (MIS 5e) are very rar...
This paper reviews the possible approaches for dating of human bones and teeth, older than 500,000. ...
We have mapped U (238U) and Th (232Th) elemental concentrations as well as U-series isotope distribu...
Teeth are usually targeted for dating archaeological sites because they are less prone to dissolutio...
U and Th concentration profiles in fossil hominid and faunal teeth have been measured by laser ablat...
Post-deposition U uptake by bones and teeth is the most significant source of inaccuracy in both U-s...
We have mapped U (238U) and Th (232Th) elemental concentrations as well as U-series isotope distribu...
Over the past two decades, the combined electron spin resonance (ESR) and U-series dating method has...
Quite often ESR dating of tooth enamel provides underestimated ages. The factors, which may account ...
Two fragments of a hominin tooth (Australopithecus robustus) and two bovid teeth from the Hanging Re...
Fossil bones and teeth usually are very common archeological findings. At many sites these remains, ...
Unlike radiometric methods based on the measurement of radioactive growth or decay of isotopes (e.g....
International audiencePalaeolithic sites associated to the Eemian Interglacial (MIS 5e) are very rar...